首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >The irrelevance of normative considerations for founding an Austrian law and economics: Reply to Marciano
【24h】

The irrelevance of normative considerations for founding an Austrian law and economics: Reply to Marciano

机译:建立奥地利法律和经济学的规范性考量无关紧要:回复马尔恰诺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a comment on my paper, “An Austrian approach to law and economics, with special reference to superstition” (Leeson 2012), Marciano contends that Posnerian foundations “may be problematic for an Austrian approach to law and economics”. In this reply I argue that the differences between Posner and Austrians that Marciano uses as the basis for his contention are normative. If, as Austrians claim, Austrian economics is purely positive, those differences are irrelevant to the appropriate foundations for an Austrian law and economics. They pose no problem for a Posnerian founding.
机译:在对我的论文“奥地利的法律和经济学方法,特别是迷信”的评论中(Leeson,2012年),马尔恰诺认为波斯尼亚的基金会“对于奥地利的法律和经济学方法可能是有问题的”。在本答复中,我认为,马尔恰诺以此为依据的波斯纳与奥地利人之间的差异是规范性的。如果按照奥地利人的说法,如果奥地利经济学纯粹是积极的,那么这些差异就与奥地利法律和经济学的适当基础无关。对于Posnerian的创立,它们没有任何问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号