...
首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Austrian Economics >Institutional stickiness of democracy in post-communist states: Can prevailing culture explain it?
【24h】

Institutional stickiness of democracy in post-communist states: Can prevailing culture explain it?

机译:后共产主义国家的民主制度粘性:流行文化可以解释吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Structural explanation of political development offers a finite set of factors that cause democracy to consolidate or not (Acemoglu and Robinson 2006). This approach is, however, insufficient to explain political development of post-communist countries because it ignores a role of social arrangements in democratic consolidation. The field of comparative political economy is becoming more acceptable to the idea that social institutions have significant impact on political development (Boettke et al. Review of Austrian Economics 18(3–4): 281–304, 2005). Using transitional experience of post-communist countries, I demonstrate that institutional stickiness of democracy depends on a combination of causal factors, including underlying political culture (Boettke et al. American Journal of Sociology and Economics 67(2), 2008; Pejovich The Review of Austrian Economics 16(4):347–361, 2003).
机译:政治发展的结构性解释提供了导致民主巩固与否的有限因素(Acemoglu and Robinson 2006)。但是,这种方法不足以解释后共产主义国家的政治发展,因为它忽略了社会安排在民主巩固中的作用。社会制度对政治发展具有重大影响的观念已被比较政治经济学领域所接受(Boettke et al。Review of Austrian Economics 18(3–4):281–304,2005)。利用后共产主义国家的过渡经验,我证明了民主的制度粘性取决于多种因果关系,包括潜在的政治文化(Boettke等人,American Journal of Sociology and Economics 67(2),2008; Pejovich The Review of奥地利经济学16(4):347-361,2003年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号