首页> 外文期刊>The review of asset pricing studies >Diversification in Funds of Hedge Funds: Is It Possible to Overdiversify?
【24h】

Diversification in Funds of Hedge Funds: Is It Possible to Overdiversify?

机译:对冲基金的基金多元化:是否可能过度多元化?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many institutions are attracted to diversified portfolios of hedge funds, referred to as Funds of Hedge Funds (FoHFs). In this article, we examine a new database that separates out for the first time the effects of diversification (the number of underlying hedge funds) from scale (the magnitude of assets under management). We find with others that the variance-reducing effects of diversification diminish once FoHFs hold more than 20 underlying hedge funds. This excess diversification actually increases their left-tail risk exposure once we account for return smoothing. Furthermore, the average FoHF in our sample is more exposed to left-tail risk than are naive 1/N randomly chosen portfolios. This increase in tail risk is accompanied by lower returns, which we attribute to the cost of necessary due diligence that increases with the number of hedge funds.
机译:对冲基金的多元化投资组合吸引了许多机构,这些对冲基金被称为对冲基金(FoHFs)。在本文中,我们研究了一个新的数据库,该数据库首次将规模分布(基础对冲基金的数量)与规模(管理资产的规模)的影响分开。我们与其他人发现,一旦FoHF持有超过20个基础对冲基金,多元化的减少方差作用就会减弱。一旦考虑了收益平滑,这种过度的分散实际上增加了他们的左尾风险敞口。此外,我们的样本中的平均FoHF比无经验的1 / N随机选择的投资组合更容易遭受左尾风险。尾部风险的增加伴随着收益的降低,我们将其归因于必要的尽职调查的成本,该成本随着对冲基金数量的增加而增加。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The review of asset pricing studies》 |2012年第1期|p.89-110|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Stern School of Business, 44 West 4~(th) Street, Suite 9-190, New York,NY 10310;

    State University of New York (Plattsburgh), 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901;

    State University of New York (Plattsburgh), 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号