首页> 外文期刊>Review of African Political Economy >A quick fix? A retrospective analysis of the Sudan Comprehensive Peace Agreement
【24h】

A quick fix? A retrospective analysis of the Sudan Comprehensive Peace Agreement

机译:快速解决?苏丹全面和平协议的回顾性分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Critics decry the 2005 peace agreement between the government of the Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement as incomplete, a result of the desire of external actors for a quick solution that is neither truly comprehensive nor sustainable. Through a chronological analysis of the peace process between 2000 and 2005, this article demonstrates that the scope for compromise was limited and that a significantly ‘better’ deal was unlikely. The article's ambition is to present a concise and empirically grounded analysis of the peace process and to lay foundations for further investigation of a crucial, contested and complicated subject in Sudan's recent history.View full textDownload full textKeywordsSouth Sudan, Comprehensive Peace Agreement, peace negotiations, conflict resolution, civil war, regional mediationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2011.630869
机译:批评者谴责苏丹政府与苏丹人民解放运动之间的2005年和平协议是不完整的,这是外部行动者渴望迅速解决既不真正全面也不可持续的解决方案的结果。通过对2000年至2005年和平进程的时间顺序分析,本文证明了折衷的范围是有限的,而且不可能达成“更好”的协议。这篇文章的目的是对和平进程进行简明的,基于经验的分析,并为进一步研究苏丹近代史上一个关键,有争议和复杂的主题奠定基础。查看全文下载全文关键字南苏丹,《全面和平协议》,和平谈判,冲突解决,内战,区域调解相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citlikelike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2011.630869

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号