首页> 外文期刊>Review of accounting studies >Measuring the market response to going concern modifications: the importance of disclosure timing
【24h】

Measuring the market response to going concern modifications: the importance of disclosure timing

机译:衡量市场对持续经营变更的反应:披露时机的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Auditor going concern modifications (GCMs) are intended to provide market participants with information related to financial distress, and prior research suggests that the disclosure of a GCM elicits a substantial negative market reaction from investors. In this study, we investigate the market reaction to GCMs in a contemporary disclosure regime and consider whether the observed market reaction is confounded by other material disclosures. We find that the majority of GCMs are issued concurrently with earnings announcements (EAs) and that EAs in the year of new GCMs elicit large negative cumulative abnormal returns (CARs). We also find that CARs surrounding GCMs are significantly more negative when GCMs are disclosed with EAs versus following EAs. We then evaluate whether GCMs convey distress that is incremental to EA disclosures by measuring i) the market reaction to GCMs disclosed following EAs, and ii) whether EA CARs are substantially more negative for companies disclosing GCMs with EAs as opposed to after EAs. In both cases, we find that the incremental market response to GCMs is statistically weak and much smaller in economic magnitude than is suggested by prior research. Finally, we find that management disclosures in EAs, rather than the presence of a GCM, appear to convey information that investors use to anticipate bankruptcy. Taken together, these findings suggest that GCMs are confounded by other significant disclosures and that the informational benefits of GCM reporting are significantly smaller than previously thought.
机译:审计师持续经营修正案(GCM)旨在向市场参与者提供与财务困境相关的信息,并且先前的研究表明,披露GCM会引起投资者的重大负面市场反应。在这项研究中,我们调查了当代信息披露制度下对GCM的市场反应,并考虑观察到的市场反应是否与其他重大信息披露相混淆。我们发现,大多数GCM都是与收益公告(EA)同时发布的,而新GCM年份的EA会引起较大的负累积异常收益(CAR)。我们还发现,与EA相比,与EA一起披露GCM时,围绕GCM的CAR的负面性明显更高。然后,我们通过衡量i)对在EA之后披露的GCM的市场反应,以及ii)EA CAR对披露具有EA的GCM的公司(而不是在EA之后)的负面影响,来评估GCM是否传递了相对于EA披露增加的困扰。在这两种情况下,我们发现对GCM的增量市场反应在统计上较弱,并且经济规模远小于先前的研究。最后,我们发现,EA中的管理披露而不是GCM的存在似乎传达了投资者用来预测破产的信息。综上所述,这些发现表明,GCM与其他重大披露相混淆,并且GCM报告的信息收益远小于先前的想象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号