...
首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Direct and indirect socio-economic benefits from ecological infrastructure interventions in the Western Cape, South Africa
【24h】

Direct and indirect socio-economic benefits from ecological infrastructure interventions in the Western Cape, South Africa

机译:从南非西开普省生态基础设施干预的直接和间接社会经济益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Investments in the restoration of ecological infrastructure are often promoted as a strategy to achieve win-win outcomes for people and the environment, and often involve the creation of temporary employment. Nevertheless, few studies have attempted to quantify the socio-economic benefits among workers employed across multiple ecological infrastructure programs. This article examines how workers involved in ecological infrastructure activities perceive the benefits from their employment, and whether their perceptions of benefits correspond with the objectives of the programs. The analysis is based on a case study from the Western Cape, South Africa. We carried out a survey with 175 workers employed by 10 different local programs. The survey was designed to target a broad array of potential benefits including natural, physical, social, financial, and human assets, in order to extend beyond simple measures of income and employment. We find that workers primarily see the program benefits in terms of improved income and short-term employment, while their natural and physical assets are perceived to be affected less. This is in line with the initial objectives of the ecological infrastructure programs in the Western Cape, since these are not targeting community-based restoration due to the absence of shared community land. Instead, they are designed to pursue poverty alleviation and social development through short-term income opportunities drawing on a public works model.
机译:在恢复生态基础设施的投资通常被推动为实现人民和环境的双赢成果的战略,并且往往涉及创造临时就业。然而,很少有研究已经试图量化在多种生态基础设施计划中雇用的工人之间的社会经济利益。本文介绍了所涉及生态基础设施活动的工作人员如何从其就业中察觉,以及他们对福利的看法是否与计划的目标相对应。分析基于南非西开普省的案例研究。我们开展了一项由10名不同当地计划雇用的175名工人进行了调查。该调查旨在瞄准广泛的潜在福利,包括自然,物理,社会,金融和人类资产,以便超越简单的收入和就业措施。我们发现工人主要在改善收入和短期就业方面看到了计划的好处,而他们的自然和物理资产被认为受到影响。这符合西开普省生态基础设施课程的初步目标,因为这些缺乏由于缺乏共享社区土地而无法瞄准基于社区的恢复。相反,他们旨在通过在公共工程模型上绘制的短期收入机会来实现扶贫和社会发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号