...
首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Adapting mechanized vascular plant seed dispersal technologies to biocrust moss restoration
【24h】

Adapting mechanized vascular plant seed dispersal technologies to biocrust moss restoration

机译:将机械化的血管植物种子分散技术与生物养老石恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Biocrust restoration is an emerging field relevant to management of rangelands. Manual dispersal of biocrust is an effective approach, though there are few examples of biocrust restoration greater than a square meter, in part because specialized machinery has yet to be developed or adapted for dispersal across larger areas. Restoration with vascular plants is now conducted using a variety of equipment for work at small to large scales. We investigated the potential of two tractor draft implements, a rangeland seed drill and imprinter, to establish moss. We assessed three treatments: moss passed through a seed drill, manually broadcasted over imprinted soil, and manually broadcasted onto unaltered soil. We conducted these treatments at two sites that differed in management histories and vegetative cover. To use the seed drill to disperse moss we needed to amend moss materials to prevent jamming, which reduced application rate. Imprinted treatments established the most cover, a result we attribute to creation of favorable microsites for establishment. Broadcast methods established a comparable number of moss colonies to broadcast-over-imprinted soil, but less cover. Drill treatments were not effective by any metric, likely due to burial of moss. Final differences between our highest cover treatment and controls were positive, but small: 2.38% in imprinted versus 0.44% in controls. However, moss cover in imprinted areas increased during our two-year experiment at this site, while controls did not. Future work should focus on integrating biocrust and vascular plant treatments and identifying equipment to efficiently achieve these goals.
机译:生物抑制是一个与牧场管理有关的新兴领域。 Biocrust的手动分散是一种有效的方法,尽管少于平方米的生物腐烂的例子,部分原因是尚未开发或适用于较大区域的分散。现在使用各种设备进行血管植物的恢复,以便在小范围内工作。我们调查了两个拖拉机草案的潜力,一个牧师种子钻头和新建,建立苔藓。我们评估了三种治疗方法:苔藓通过种子钻,手动播出压印的土壤,并手动广播到未改变的土壤上。我们在两种地方进行了这些治疗,这些遗传历史和植物覆盖率不同。使用种子钻头分散苔藓,我们需要修改苔藓材料以防止干扰,这减少了应用率。印记治疗成立了最多的封面,结果我们归因于建立有利的微量的建立。广播方法建立了比较数量的苔藓殖民地,以广播过度印记的土壤,但较少的封面。钻探治疗因任何公制都没有有效,可能是由于墓地的苔藓。我们最高覆盖治疗和对照之间的最终差异是阳性的,但小:对照中印迹与0.44%的2.38%。然而,在我们在本网站的两年实验期间,苔藓覆盖在印记区域增加,而控制则没有。未来的工作应专注于整合生物科和血管植物治疗和识别设备,以有效地实现这些目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号