...
首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Comparing the recovery of richness, structure, and biomass in naturally regrowing and planted reforestation
【24h】

Comparing the recovery of richness, structure, and biomass in naturally regrowing and planted reforestation

机译:比较自然生长和人工造林中的丰富度,结构和生物量的恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The clearing of natural vegetation for agriculture has reduced the capacity of natural systems to provide ecosystem functions. Ecological restoration can restore desirable ecosystem functions, such as creating habitat for animal conservation and carbon sequestration as woody biomass. In order to maintain these beneficial ecosystem functions, restoration projects need to mature into self-perpetuating communities. Here we compared the ecological attributes of two types of restoration, "active" tree plantings with "passive" natural forest regeneration ("natural regrowth") to existing remnant vegetation in a cleared agricultural landscape. Specifically, we measured differences between forest categories in factors that may predict future restoration failure or ecosystem collapse: aboveground plant biomass and biomass accrual over time (for regrowing stands), plant density and size class distributions, and diversity of functional groups based on seed dispersal and growth strategy traits. We found that natural regrowth and planted forests were similar in many ecological characteristics, including biomass accrual. Despite this, planted stands contained fewer tree recruit and shrub individuals, which may be due to limited recruitment in plantings. If this continues, these forests may be at risk of collapsing into nonforest states after mature trees senesce. Lower shrub density and richness of mid-story trees may lead to lower structural complexity in planting plots, and alongside lower richness of fleshy-fruited plant species may reduce animal resources and animal use of the restored stand. In our study region, natural regrowth may result in restored woodland communities with greater conservation and carbon mitigation value.
机译:为农业清除天然植被减少了自然系统提供生态系统功能的能力。生态恢复可以恢复理想的生态系统功能,例如为动物保护和碳固存(作为木质生物质)创造栖息地。为了维持这些有益的生态系统功能,恢复项目需要成熟到自我永存的社区。在这里,我们比较了两种类型的恢复的生态属性,即“主动”植树和“被动”天然林再生(“自然再生”)与已清除的农业景观中现有的残留植被。具体而言,我们测量了森林类别之间的差异,这些差异可能会预测未来的恢复失败或生态系统崩溃:地上植物生物量和生物量随时间的增长(对于生长林分),植物密度和大小类别分布以及基于种子扩散的功能组的多样性和成长策略特征。我们发现自然再生长和人工林在许多生态特征(包括应计生物量)方面相似。尽管如此,种植的林分所包含的树木和灌木个体较少,这可能是由于种植面积有限。如果这种情况继续下去,成熟的树木衰老后,这些森林可能会崩溃为非森林状态。较低的灌木密度和中层树木的丰度可能会导致种植地块的结构复杂性降低,同时肉果类植物物种的较低丰度可能会减少恢复林分的动物资源和动物使用量。在我们的研究区域中,自然再生长可能会导致林地群落得到恢复,并具有更大的保护价值和碳减排价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号