首页> 外文期刊>Restoration ecology >Soil Organism And Plant Introductions In Restoration Of Species-rich Grassland Communities
【24h】

Soil Organism And Plant Introductions In Restoration Of Species-rich Grassland Communities

机译:物种丰富的草地群落恢复中的土壤有机体和植物引种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Soil organisms can strongly affect competitive interactions and successional replacements of grassland plant species. However, introduction of whole soil communities as management strategy in grassland restoration has received little experimental testing. In a 5-year field experiment at a topsoil-removed ex-arable site (receptor site), we tested effects of (1) spreading hay and soil, independently or combined, and (2) transplanting intact turfs on plant and soil nematode community development. Material for the treatments was obtained from later successional, species-rich grassland (donor site). Spreading hay affected plant community composition, whereas spreading soil did not have additional effects. Plant species composition of transplanted turfs became less similar to that in the donor site. Moreover, most plants did not expand into the receiving plots. Soil spreading and turf transplantation did not affect soil nematode community composition. Unfavorable soil conditions (e.g., low organic matter content andrnseasonal fluctuations in water level) at the receptor site may have limited plant and nematode survival in the turfs and may have precluded successful establishment outside the turfs. We conclude that introduction of later successional soil organisms into a topsoil-removed soil did not facilitate the establishment of later successional plants, probably because of the "mismatch" in abiotic soil conditions between the donor and the receptor site. Further research should focus on the required conditions for establishment of soil organisms at restoration sites in order to make use of their contribution to grassland restoration. We propose that introduction of organisms from "intermediate" stages will be more effective as management strategy than introduction of organisms from "target" stages.
机译:土壤有机体会强烈影响草地植物物种的竞争性相互作用和相继替代。然而,引入整个土壤群落作为草地恢复的管理策略却鲜有实验性的试验。在为期5年的在表土去除的可耕地点(受体地点)进行的田间试验,我们测试了(1)干草或土壤的散布,无论是单独还是结合使用,以及(2)将完整草皮移植到植物和土壤线虫群落上的效果发展。用于处理的材料是从后来的,物种丰富的演替草地(捐助地点)获得的。散布干草会影响植物群落组成,而散布土壤则没有其他影响。移植草皮的植物物种组成变得与供体部位的相似。而且,大多数植物没有扩展到接收地。土壤传播和草皮移植未影响土壤线虫群落组成。受体部位的土壤条件不佳(例如有机物含量低和季节水位波动)可能会限制草皮中植物和线虫的存活,并可能阻止在草皮外成功地定植。我们得出的结论是,将后继土壤生物引入到去除表土的土壤中并不能促进后继植物的建立,这可能是由于非生物土壤条件在供体和受体位点之间存在“不匹配”。进一步的研究应集中于在恢复点建立土壤生物的必要条件,以便利用其对草地恢复的贡献。我们建议,从“中间”阶段引入生物比从“目标”阶段引入生物作为管理策略更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号