首页> 外文期刊>Research in Transportation Business and Management >Port mergers: Why not Los Angeles and Long Beach?
【24h】

Port mergers: Why not Los Angeles and Long Beach?

机译:港口合并:为什么不选择洛杉矶和长滩?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There have been significant attempts to merge the San Pedro Bay Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach since their creation as separate municipal authorities in 1911. These efforts continue to the present day with the most recent proposal made in 2014. Yet all efforts to merge the two largest container ports in North America have failed. A review of attempts to promote or force the merger of the two ports was undertaken to identify the motivating factors behind the merger proposals, how the merger concepts were initiated and why they failed. Those who proposed merging the ports were typically business groups, port users or elected officials but not port administrators. Merger proposals were often motivated by the desire to eliminate what merger proponents viewed as destructive competition, duplication of facilities, or because one port coveted the resources of the other.Yet, all merger proposals have failed to gain widespread support for two primary reasons. First, all proposals came from outside the port administration, often generated without any port knowledge or participation and limited stakeholder involvement. Second, none of the merger proposals were accompanied by an objective analysis identifying the benefits to accrue to both port cities from a merger. Although attempts to merge the two ports failed, cooperative efforts between the ports increased in the 1980's, spurred by problems confronting both port administrations, that is, the impacts of containerization on the surrounding communities. The ports used a variety of governance tools to affect cooperative arrangements including creation of quasi-independent single purpose authorities. Initial efforts focused on improving hinterland infrastructure. The increased use of “discussion agreements” approved by the Federal Maritime Administration allowed the ports to expand cooperative efforts to environmental and logistics matters. The willingness and initiatives of the ports to cooperate, when necessary, has negated serious consideration of merger proposals. Instead, the two ports have increasingly expanded cooperative efforts to address common issues while retaining their independent jurisdictions.
机译:自1911年创建独立的市政当局以来,一直在尝试合并洛杉矶和长滩的圣佩德罗湾港口。这些努力一直持续到今天,并于2014年提出了最新建议。北美两个最大的集装箱港口都失败了。对促进或强迫两个港口合并的尝试进行了审查,以确定合并提议背后的动机因素,合并概念的发起方式和失败的原因。提议合并港口的人通常是企业集团,港口用户或民选官员,但不是港口管理员。合并提案通常是出于消除合并提议者被视为破坏性竞争,设施重复或由于一个港口垂涎另一个港口资源的愿望而驱动的。然而,所有合并提案都未能获得广泛支持,主要有两个原因。首先,所有建议都来自港口管理部门之外,通常是在没有任何港口知识或参与且利益相关者参与有限的情况下产生的。其次,没有一项合并建议伴随有一项客观分析,该分析确定了合并带来的两个港口城市的收益。尽管合并这两个港口的尝试失败了,但是在1980年代,由于两个港口管理部门都面临着问题,即集装箱运输对周围社区的影响,港口之间的合作努力有所增加。港口使用各种治理工具来影响合作安排,包括创建准独立的单一目的机构。最初的工作集中在改善内陆基础设施上。联邦海事管理局批准使用更多的“讨论协议”,使港口得以将合作努力扩大到环境和物流事务上。港口在必要时进行合作的意愿和倡议已经否定了对合并提案的认真考虑。取而代之的是,两个港口在保持各自独立管辖权的同时,越来越多地为解决共同问题而进行合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号