...
首页> 外文期刊>Research Technology Management >Designing the Qualitative and Textual Input User Interface
【24h】

Designing the Qualitative and Textual Input User Interface

机译:设计定性和文本输入用户界面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A few software companies offer strategic valuation portfolio systems, which differ from the many project portfolio offerings. These strategic valuation systems focus on strategic decisions, and their usage is in the hands of a relatively small number of managers and skilled analysts who provide arm's-length assessments coupled with business modeling savvy that assures that the portfolio data is independent, unbiased, and reasonably perspicacious. These systems must manage very early-stage concepts that have scant quantitative data. Most strategic valuation portfolio systems solve this challenge by using scored qualitative (quasi-quantitative) assessments augmented by weighting mechanisms. In many respects these methods are similar to well-known AHP techniques, much like the IRI anchor scales (Scriven 2001). This approach'works well for managers who understand the concepts and the strategic field. However, when the strategic portfolio is integrated with ideation events and there are scores or hundreds of concepts to evaluate, time constraints prevent most managers from making informed assessments.
机译:一些软件公司提供战略评估投资组合系统,这与许多项目投资组合产品不同。这些战略评估系统着重于战略决策,并且由少数管理人员和熟练分析人员使用,他们提供公平的评估以及精通业务建模的知识,以确保投资组合数据是独立的,无偏见的,合理的。敏锐的。这些系统必须管理非常少的定量数据的早期概念。大多数战略评估投资组合系统通过使用加权机制增强的定性定性(准定量)评估来解决这一挑战。在许多方面,这些方法与众所周知的AHP技术相似,非常类似于IRI锚定标尺(Scriven 2001)。这种方法对于了解概念和战略领域的经理来说非常有效。但是,当战略投资组合与构想事件结合在一起并且需要评估数十个或数百个概念时,时间限制会阻止大多数管理者进行明智的评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research Technology Management 》 |2011年第5期| p.40| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号