首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: Looking for healthy communities and ecosystems
【24h】

Selecting an open innovation community as an alliance partner: Looking for healthy communities and ecosystems

机译:选择开放创新社区作为联盟合作伙伴:寻找健康的社区和生态系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Organizations build strategic alliances with other firms with the intent of tapping into partners' resources and capturing long-term value from these relationships. Such partnerships are typically governed by contractual or equity arrangements with clear mutual obligations. More recently, however, organizations have begun to seek strategic partnerships with open innovation communities, which are novel digitally enabled forms of organizing, and where contractual commitments are not possible. Thus, selecting the right open innovation community as an alliance partner becomes a more complex decision. We follow how the organizational decision makers, in two technology firms that were pioneers of forming strategic alliances with open innovation communities, developed metrics around making such decisions. We build upon Shah and Swaminathan's (2008) contingency model of alliance partner selection and consider how it applies to the case of partnering with open innovation communities. This framework was useful in to frame our findings, yet our work recognizes and builds upon two key differences: 1) the evaluation metrics used in selecting an open innovation community were more focused on value creation than value capture; and 2) open ecosystem considerations, and not just partner-specific metrics, featured prominently in this type of alliance partner evaluation. We develop the notions of community and ecosystem health to refer to these new metrics.
机译:组织与其他公司建立战略联盟,意图进入合作伙伴资源并从这些关系中捕获长期价值。此类伙伴关系通常由具有明确的共同义务的合同或股权安排。然而,最近,组织已经开始寻求与公开创新社区的战略伙伴关系,这些社区是新的数字支持的组织形式,以及合同承诺不可能。因此,选择正确的开放创新社区作为联盟伙伴成为一个更复杂的决定。我们遵循组织决策者的两家技术公司如何与开放创新社区形成战略联盟的先驱,在制定此类决策时发达了指标。我们建立了Shah和Swaminathan(2008)的联盟合作伙伴选择的应急模式,并考虑如何与公开创新社区合作的情况。该框架在框架的调查结果中很有用,但我们的工作识别并建立了两个关键差异:1)选择开放创新社区的评估指标更专注于价值创建而不是价值捕获; 2)开放生态系统的考虑,而不仅仅是特定于合作伙伴的指标,在​​这种联盟合作伙伴评估中占据突出的特定度量。我们开发社区和生态系统健康的概念,以引用这些新指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号