首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy
【24h】

The economic impacts of academic spin-off companies, and their implications for public policy

机译:学术衍生公司的经济影响及其对公共政策的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The importance of academic research ("AR") to economic growth is widely accepted but quantification of incremental impacts, and their attribution to any one country's expenditures, is difficult. Yet quantitative justification of government AR funding is highly desirable. We therefore attempt to quantify one impact which can be directly and causally attributed to one country's funding: spin-off companies. We focus on AR in the non-medical natural sciences and engineering (NSExm) in a whole country, Canada. 'Applied' disciplines are sometimes assumed to be the most commercializable, so we also separately investigate an especially 'basic' science, physics. Using a novel methodology, we estimate the lifetime impacts of companies spun-off directly from AR performed in 1960-1998, and compare the impacts with all government funding, direct and indirect, over the same period. This picks up virtually all funding and most company-formation since WWII, up to 1998. Such long-term studies are rare but essential, since we show that successful spin-offs grow (often exponentially) over several decades.rnWith very conservative assumptions, and allowing for the time value of money, the impacts exceed government funding by a substantial margin. Physics actually fares 30-60% better than the combined NSExm; this reflects more successful companies, rather than greater numbers, and therefore does not seem inconsistent with earlier studies on company numbers. Firm lifetimes are long, with Canadian impacts truncated primarily by some foreign acquisitions.rnWe argue that the spin-off impacts represent incremental contributions to GDP, much larger (even on a time-discounted basis) than the government funding and directly attributable to it; governments will also receive more in additional tax than they spent. The impacts therefore provide a quantitative justification for the public investment, allowing the much more important (but less quantifiable) long-term benefits to be regarded as a 'free' bonus. The very good showing of physics also suggests that reduced emphasis on basic work or on the basic disciplines could actually weaken the commercialization of AR.
机译:学术研究(“ AR”)对经济增长的重要性已被广泛接受,但难以量化增量影响及其对任何一个国家支出的影响。然而,政府对AR资金的定量论证是非常可取的。因此,我们试图量化可直接归因于一国资金的一种影响:衍生公司。我们专注于整个加拿大非医学自然科学与工程(NSExm)中的AR。有时认为“应用”学科是最可商业化的学科,因此我们还分别研究了特别是“基础”科学,物理的学科。使用一种新颖的方法,我们估算了直接从AR在1960-1998年间剥离出来的公司的生命周期影响,并将其与同期所有直接和间接政府资助相比较。这几乎收集了第二次世界大战以来至1998年的所有资金和大多数公司组建。这样的长期研究很少,但必不可少,因为我们证明成功的附带利益在几十年中呈增长态势(通常呈指数增长)。并且考虑到货币的时间价值,其影响将大大超过政府的资助。实际上,物理学的成绩要比合并的NSExm好30-60%;这反映了更多成功的公司,而不是更多的公司,因此,这似乎与早期关于公司号的研究并不一致。公司的生命周期很长,加拿大的影响主要被一些外国收购所截断。rn我们认为,分拆影响代表对GDP的增量贡献,比政府资金大得多(即使是按时间折现),也可以直接归因于它。政府还将获得比他们所花的更多的额外税收。因此,这些影响为公共投资提供了定量的依据,从而使更为重要(但可量化性较低)的长期利益被视为“免费”奖金。很好的物理学表现也表明,减少对基础工作或基础学科的重视实际上会削弱AR的商业化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号