首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Rerun the tape of history and QWERTY always wins: Response to Arthur, Margolis, and Vergne
【24h】

Rerun the tape of history and QWERTY always wins: Response to Arthur, Margolis, and Vergne

机译:重新记录历史,QWERTY总是赢家:对亚瑟,马戈利斯和韦尔涅的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper being debated here is very different from the one that was first submitted for consideration to Research Policy. Initially, I did not see the story as fundamentally inconsistent with the work of Arthur (1983) and Arthur (1989) and David (1985), and indeed I still see it as relying on their arguments on network externalities, increasing returns and lock-in to explain why QWERTY persists as a universal standard to the present day. I tried not to over-claim for the paper, but as the editor, the referees and the three commentators here have made clear, the fuller story is both more complicated and more interesting.
机译:此处讨论的论文与最初提交给研究政策的论文完全不同。最初,我并不认为这个故事与Arthur(1983),Arthur(1989)和David(1985)的工作有根本的矛盾,实际上,我仍然认为它依赖于他们对网络外部性的论据,增加的回报和锁定。解释为什么QWERTY至今仍是通用标准。我试着不为论文夸大其词,但正如编辑,裁判员和三位评论员所说的那样,完整的故事既复杂又有趣。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2013年第7期|1195-1196|共2页
  • 作者

    Neil M. Kay;

  • 作者单位

    University of Strathclyde Business School, Sir William Duncan Building, 130 Rottenrow, Glasgow G40GE, UKEdinburgh Business School, Heriot-Watt University, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号