首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Intellectual property infringements due to R&D abroad? A comparative analysis between firms with international and domestic innovation activities
【24h】

Intellectual property infringements due to R&D abroad? A comparative analysis between firms with international and domestic innovation activities

机译:是否因国外研发而侵犯知识产权?具有国际和国内创新活动的企业之间的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper aims to analyse the risk of intellectual property (IP) infringements by competitors from abroad and in particular to consider whether this risk is higher for international innovating firms. We distinguish three different types of IP infringements from abroad: the usage of firms' technical inventions, product piracy, and copying of corporate names and designs. Our analysis rests on the German data from the Europe-wide Community Innovation Survey (CIS). We use a unique data set of about 900 observations, which are retrieved from two survey waves. While the earlier wave contains information about international and domestic innovation activities, the later wave reports IP infringements. In a second analysis, the likelihood of infringements from innovation host countries and no-innovation host countries abroad is examined. Before the empirical analysis, an exploratory study was carried out in China with interviews of German firms with innovation activities in China and with a legal advisor for small and medium-sized German enterprises. The results show that firms with international R&D activities are increasing their chances of losing technological knowledge to their local competitors abroad. R&D activities in countries with weak intellectual property rights increase the risk for all types of IP infringements compared to domestic R&D activities. Infringements by competitors from the host country are driven by the production of new produces in this country. Export intensity is the major driver of infringements from no-innovation host countries. R&D activities in China and North America also increase the risk of an infringement. However, firms that innovate only in their home country experience significantly more product piracy cases than international innovating firms.
机译:本文旨在分析国外竞争者侵犯知识产权(IP)的风险,尤其是考虑这种风险对国际创新公司而言是否更高。我们将国外的知识产权侵权分为三种:公司技术发明的使用,产品盗版以及公司名称和设计的复制。我们的分析基于欧洲社区创新调查(CIS)的德国数据。我们使用大约900个观测值的唯一数据集,这些数据集是从两个调查波中检索到的。前一波包含有关国际和国内创新活动的信息,而后一波则报告了知识产权侵权。在第二个分析中,研究了国外创新所在国和非创新所在国侵权的可能性。在进行实证分析之前,在中国进行了一项探索性研究,采访了在中国从事创新活动的德国公司,并为德国中小型企业提供了法律顾问。结果表明,从事国际研发活动的公司正在增加其向国外本地竞争对手流失技术知识的机会。与国内研发活动相比,知识产权薄弱国家的研发活动增加了所有类型知识产权侵权的风险。东道国竞争对手的侵权行为是由该国新产品的生产驱动的。出口强度是非创新所在国侵权的主要驱动力。在中国和北美的研发活动也增加了侵权的风险。但是,仅在本国进行创新的公司比国际创新公司遭受的产品盗版案件要多得多。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2013年第8期|1482-1495|共14页
  • 作者

    Anja Schmiele;

  • 作者单位

    ZEW GmbH, Department of Industrial Economics and International Management, Post Box 103443, 68034 Mannheim, Germany,WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management, Chair of Microeconomics and Industrial Economics, Burgplatz 2. 56179 Vallendar, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    RD; Innovation; Internationalisation; Intellectual property; Infringement; China;

    机译:研发;革新;国际化;知识产权;侵权;中国;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:53:28

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号