首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?
【24h】

Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?

机译:激进的或增量的:研发政策在哪里受到打击?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study investigates the impact and effectiveness of a public R&D support policy. In a policy design that aims at incentivizing radical as well as incremental innovations, we test where the policy impact is highest. While the privately motivated R&D expenditures are significant for both types of innovation, the policy-induced part is significant only for radical innovation. Furthermore, given that the funding agency encourages collaboration, and particularly industry-science collaboration, we further test whether effects are enhanced in collaborating firms. We do not find any evidence pointing to increased effects for the latter.
机译:本研究调查了公共研发支持政策的影响和有效性。在旨在激励激进和渐进式创新的政策设计中,我们测试了政策影响最大的地方。尽管私营部门的研发支出对于这两种类型的创新都是重要的,但政策引发的部分仅对于激进创新而言是重要的。此外,鉴于资助机构鼓励合作,特别是行业科学合作,我们进一步测试了合作公司的效果是否增强。我们没有发现任何证据表明后者会增加效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号