首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Knowledge, Proximity and R&D Exodus
【24h】

Knowledge, Proximity and R&D Exodus

机译:知识,邻近性和R&D外流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We explore not only how technological leaders and laggards react to agglomeration, but within an agglomeration we look at how the relative presence of other leaders, laggards and foreign firms affects these firms. Existing literature argues that technological leaders experience net knowledge outflows and are therefore losers in agglomerations. However, we do not know if they avoid locations with laggards more so than locations with leaders or vice versa, thus we examine how the relative presence of each affects leaders' location decisions. For technologically lagging firms, we argue they will prefer locations with leaders over locations with laggards. We further posit that an increasing presence of foreign firms will have a particularly detrimental effect on technologically leading domestic firms, as these lose out in the contest for talent. Contextualized in an emerging market with weak intellectual property rights protection, we examine whether these concerns about knowledge spillovers and competition for talent prompt firms to close their R&D facilities or remain open. Using 5798 observations of R&D laboratories in India during 2003-2011, we find that while technologically leading firms are more likely to close their R&D facilities as the presence of other domestic labs increases, laggards are less likely to do so. These findings suggest concerns over knowledge spillovers are present, especially on the part of technologically leading firms. Moreover, leaders are more concerned by the presence of other leaders. Technologically lagging firms, by contrast, are less likely to close R&D facilities in the face of these concerns and will prefer staying near leaders over laggards. Finally, we find evidence of foreign firms crowding out domestic technological leaders but not laggards in the competition for talent.
机译:我们不仅探索技术领导者和落后者对集聚的反应,而且在集聚中我们研究其他领导者,落后者和外国公司的相对存在如何影响这些公司。现有文献认为,技术领导者会经历净知识流失,因此是集聚的失败者。但是,我们不知道他们是否比带有领导者的位置更避开落后的位置,反之亦然,因此,我们研究了每种情况的相对存在如何影响领导者的位置决策。对于技术落后的公司,我们认为他们更喜欢有领导者的职位而不是落后的职位。我们进一步假设,外国公司数量的增加将对技术领先的国内公司产生特别不利的影响,因为这些公司会在人才争夺中败北。在知识产权保护薄弱的新兴市场中,我们考察了有关知识溢出和人才竞争的担忧是否促使企业关闭研发设施或保持开放状态。根据2003年至2011年印度对R&D实验室的5798份观察,我们发现,随着其他国内实验室的出现,技术领先的公司更有可能关闭其R&D设施,而落后的公司则不太可能这样做。这些发现表明存在对知识溢出的担忧,特别是在技术领先的公司方面。此外,领导者更关心其他领导者的存在。相比之下,技术落后的公司在面对这些担忧时不太可能关闭研发设施,他们宁愿与落后者保持领先地位。最后,我们发现有证据表明外国公司挤占了国内技术领先者,但在人才竞争中却没有落后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号