首页> 外文期刊>Research in International Business and Finance >FRC intervention, financial reporting quality and due diligence
【24h】

FRC intervention, financial reporting quality and due diligence

机译:FRC干预,财务报告质量和尽职调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study provides evidence of the relationship between government intervention, financial reporting quality and due diligence. Specifically, the authors examine the consequences of the disclosure of inspection reports by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) for individual audit firms inspected in the UK. Using a difference-in-differences design, it is found that clients are more likely to receive qualified audit opinions during the post-disclosure period. This significant impact on reporting decisions is more concentrated among clients of small audit firms. Moreover, despite general efficiency during the sample period, clients affected by an FRC intervention experience longer delays in receiving their audit reports. Overall, this study contributes to literature on corporate governance and audit regulation, and has implications for policy making. FRC inspections are of greater concern to small audit firms than large firms, as the latter have already built a strong reputation. In general, the transparent inspection process may be beneficial in enhancing auditor oversight.
机译:本研究提供了政府干预,财务报告质量和尽职调查之间关系的证据。具体而言,作者审查了财务报告理事会(FRC)对英国检查的个人审计公司披露检查报告的后果。使用差异差异差异设计,发现客户在披露期间更有可能获得合格的审计意见。对报告决策的这种重大影响更为集中在小型审计公司的客户之间。此外,尽管样品期间的一般效率,但受FRC干预影响的客户在收到审计报告时延长延迟。总体而言,这项研究有助于对公司治理和审计监管的文献,并对政策制定有影响。由于后者已经建立了强大的声誉,FRC检查对小型审计公司具有比大公司更加关注。一般而言,透明检验过程可能有利于提高审计员监督。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号