首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Critical analysis of the European Union directive which regulates the use of biofuels: An approach to the Spanish case
【24h】

Critical analysis of the European Union directive which regulates the use of biofuels: An approach to the Spanish case

机译:对规范生物燃料使用的欧盟指令的批判性分析:西班牙案例的一种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

For more than a decade we have lived in a period where the so-called "sustainability" is crucial and is motivated primarily by the social awareness of achieving a balance between human development and the conservation of the environment. This philosophy has a direct and inevitable impact on business and politics. Governments have long since been developing standards and encouraging various diverse initiatives whose aim is to defend the environment.rnIn recent times, the global debate on the environment has been centred on CO_2 emissions. This gas is the major cause of the "greenhouse effect" and people are more concerned with the idea that the emissions of this gas should be minimized. As a result of this concern, the Kyoto Protocol was enacted and subscribed to by many countries, setting the maximum gas emissions for them.rnFossil fuels are a major source of CO_2 emissions. In 2003 the European Union (EU) directive 2003/30/ EC [2003/30/EC Directive of the European Parliament and the Council-8th may 2003. On the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport] was developed with the aim of promoting the use of biofuels as a substitute for diesel or petrol among European Union countries as well as to contribute to fulfilling the commitments on climate change, security of supply in environmentally friendly conditions and the promotion of renewable energy sources.rnIn order to achieve these goals, the directive forces all EU members to ensure that at least 5.75% of all petrol and diesel fuels sold for transport purposes are biofuels before December 31 of 2010. European Union countries have social and economic characteristics unique to themselves. The energy dependence from foreign sources, the features of the agricultural sector or the degree of industrialization varies greatly from one country to another. In this context, it is questionable whether the obligation imposed by this directive applies to achieve uniform and/or identical goals in each of the countries involved and whether the actions of the various governments are also aligned with these goals.
机译:十多年来,我们一直生活在所谓的“可持续性”至关重要的时期,其动机主要是出于实现人类发展与环境保护之间平衡的社会意识。这种哲学对商业和政治产生直接而不可避免的影响。长期以来,各国政府一直在制定标准,并鼓励旨在保护环境的各种举措。rn最近,有关环境的全球辩论一直集中在CO_2的排放上。这种气体是造成“温室效应”的主要原因,人们更加关注应将这种气体的排放量降至最低的想法。由于这种关注,许多国家制定并加入了《京都议定书》,为它们设定了最大的气体排放量。化石燃料是CO_2排放的主要来源。 2003年,制定了欧洲联盟(EU)指令2003/30 / EC [欧洲议会和理事会的2003/30 / EC指令,2003年5月8日。关于促进使用生物燃料或其他可再生燃料的运输]目的是在欧盟国家中促进使用生物燃料替代柴油或汽油,并为履行有关气候变化,环境友好条件下的供应安全和促进可再生能源的承诺做出贡献。为了实现这些目标,该指令强制所有欧盟成员国确保在2010年12月31日之前出售的所有用于运输目的的汽油和柴油中至少有5.75%是生物燃料。欧盟国家具有自己独特的社会和经济特征。外国对能源的依赖,农业部门的特征或工业化程度在一个国家与另一个国家之间差异很大。在这种情况下,令人怀疑的是,该指令所施加的义务是否适用于在每个相关国家中实现统一和/或相同的目标,以及各国政府的行动是否也符合这些目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号