首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative water heater systems operating with unreliable water supplies
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative water heater systems operating with unreliable water supplies

机译:供水不可靠的替代热水器系统的成本效益分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper reports on a cost-effectiveness analysis of four types of water heating systems operating in a situation where there is an unreliable water supply. These systems are electric water heating, a solar water heating system (SWHS) with electricity back-up, the SWHS with an LPG water heater, and an LPG water heater alone. It is found that in the conditions of North Cyprus, an SWHS with an LPG heater backup is the most cost-effective, most convenient and most environmentally friendly system. The last two systems all have a cost per m(3) of hot water that is approximately 50% of the cost of heating water by electricity. This study finds that in situations where there is a winter or cloudy season, the choice of the source of energy for SWHS's back-up during this period is critical for its overall cost-effectiveness. When a pressurized supply of water is available, the cost of heating water is reduced by 20% for the SWHS with LPG back-up and for the heating of water by the LPG heater alone. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文报告了在供水不可靠的情况下运行的四种类型的热水系统的成本效益分析。这些系统分别是电热水,带有备用电的太阳能热水系统(SWHS),带有LPG热水器的SWHS和单独的LPG热水器。人们发现,在北塞浦路斯,配备LPG加热器备用的SWHS是最经济,最方便,最环保的系统。最后两个系统每m(3)的热水成本大约是用电加热水成本的50%。这项研究发现,在冬季或阴天的情况下,在此期间选择SWHS备用电源的能源对其整体成本效益至关重要。当有加压供水时,对于带有备用液化石油气的SWHS以及仅由LPG加热器加热的水,热水成本可降低20%。 (c)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号