首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Institutional diversity, policy niches, and smart grids: A review of the evolution of Smart Grid policy and practice in Ontario, Canada
【24h】

Institutional diversity, policy niches, and smart grids: A review of the evolution of Smart Grid policy and practice in Ontario, Canada

机译:制度多样性,政策壁ches和智能电网:加拿大安大略省智能电网政策和实践的发展回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Jurisdictions around the world are responding the to potential of smart grids in different ways. This paper employs a multi-level perspective approach to socio-technological transitions to examine why the Canadian province of Ontario has seen a relatively smooth transition of smart meter technologies from the niche to regime levels as compared with other Canadian provinces, and other jurisdictions in the United States, European Union, and Australia. The paper also examines the reasons for Ontario's advanced legislative and policy framework around Smart Grid development, relative to those of other provinces. The complex institutional landscape around electricity that has emerged in Ontario since the break-up of the province's monopoly utility Ontario Hydro in the late 1990s emerges as a significant factor in both outcomes. The role of the province's municipally owned local distribution companies as the primary agents for smart meter deployment, as opposed to a dominant vertically integrated utility, appears to have had an important mediating effect on public opposition to smart meters. With respect to Smart Grid policy, the diversity of high capacity institutional actors that now define the province's electricity policy landscape has facilitated the emergence of several interagency policy development niches. In a manner consistent with the concept of technological niches in the socio-technical transitions literature, the interagency status of these policy niches has shielded them from the regime level selective pressures that would likely have existed in a more unified institutional structure, and empowered new policy ideas to move from the niche to regime levels. These outcomes have significant implications for the understanding of socio-technological transitions, particularly around the role of institutional complexity in the emergence of niches for technology and policy development purposes and in niche to regime level transitions.
机译:世界各地的司法管辖区都以不同的方式响应智能电网的潜力。本文采用了多层次的视角来进行社会技术转型,以研究为什么加拿大安大略省的智能电表技术从利基市场向政权水平的过渡要比加拿大其他省和加拿大其他司法管辖区相对平稳。美国,欧盟和澳大利亚。本文还研究了安大略省相对于其他省份而言,围绕智能电网发展的先进立法和政策框架的原因。自1990年代末安大略省垄断公用事业安大略水电公司解体以来,在安大略省出现了围绕电力的复杂机构格局,这是这两种结果的重要因素。与占主导地位的垂直整合公用事业相反,该省的市级地方配电公司作为智能电表部署的主要代理者的角色似乎对公众反对智能电表产生了重要的中介作用。关于智能电网政策,现在定义该省电力政策前景的高容量机构参与者的多样性促进了几个跨部门政策发展壁垒的出现。与社会技术转型文献中的技术壁concept概念相一致,这些政策壁ches的机构间地位使他们免受了可能在更统一的体制结构中可能存在的政权层面的选择压力,并赋权了新政策从利基市场转向政权层面的想法。这些成果对理解社会技术转型具有重要意义,尤其是在为技术和政策制定目的而出现的利基市场以及向政权级过渡的利基市场中,机构复杂性的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号