首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint
【24h】

Comprehensive comparison of multiple renewable power generation methods: A combination analysis of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint

机译:多种可再生能源方法的全面比较:生命周期评估和生态足迹的组合分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the goal of carbon neutrality has been proposed consecutively, renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and bioenergy are gaining close attention in national strategic and sustainable development plans. Along with the development of renewable energy generation technologies, it is necessary to assess the environmental burden of renewable energy generation. This study analyzed the economic and environmental benefits of wind power, solar power, and biomass power generation methods over their life cycle. This paper comprehensively assessed and compared their environmental impacts based on a life cycle assessment (LCA) framework combined with ecological footprint analysis for the three renewable energy generation in China, and compared the results with those of thermal power generation to make strategic suggestions for the renewable energy power generation industry. The results show that: (1) wind power consumed the least energy, only 6.80 kJ/kWh, and had the lowest emissions of CO2, SO2, NOx and CO and environmental impact potential. (2) Based on the ecological footprint analysis on the provincial level, only Anhui, Shandong and Jiangsu provinces showed ecological deficits, while the other provinces were in ecological surplus, mostly above 50% of their ecological areas. (3) Compared to thermal power generation, which consumed 1170.911 kJ/kWh, wind power was the only one of the three renewable energy achieved a reduction in energy consumption. Wind power is currently the most efficient way of generating renewable energy.
机译:随着碳中立性的目标是连续提出的,可再生能源,如风,太阳能和生物能源,在国家战略和可持续发展计划方面正在密切关注。随着可再生能源发电技术的发展,有必要评估可再生能源生成的环境负担。本研究分析了风电,太阳能和生物量发电方法的经济和环境益处。本文综合评估,并将其基于生命周期评估(LCA)框架的环境影响与中国三种可再生能源生成的生态足迹分析相结合,并将结果与​​热发电的结果进行了比较,以对可再生制定战略建议能源发电行业。结果表明:(1)风力消耗能源最少,仅为6.80千克/千瓦时,具有最低的二氧化碳,SO2,NOx和CO和环境影响潜力。 (2)基于省级生态足迹分析,山东省唯一的安徽和江苏省表现出生态赤字,而其他省份则处于生态盈余,主要是其生态区域的50%以上。 (3)与热发电相比,该火力发电,其消耗1170.911 KJ / kWh,风力力是三种可再生能源中唯一的一种,实现了能耗降低。风电现在是产生可再生能源的最有效的方式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews》 |2021年第9期|111255.1-111255.11|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Northeastern Univ SEP Key Lab Ecoind Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China|Northeastern Univ Sch Met Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China;

    Northeastern Univ SEP Key Lab Ecoind Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China|Northeastern Univ Sch Met Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China;

    Youwin Educ Shenyang 110031 Liaoning Peoples R China;

    Northeastern Univ SEP Key Lab Ecoind Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China|Northeastern Univ Sch Met Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China;

    Northeastern Univ SEP Key Lab Ecoind Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China|Northeastern Univ Sch Met Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China;

    Northeastern Univ SEP Key Lab Ecoind Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China|Northeastern Univ Sch Met Shenyang 110819 Liaoning Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Life cycle assessment; Ecological footprint; Wind power; Solar photovoltaic power; Biomass power; Environmental impacts;

    机译:生命周期评估;生态足迹;风力;太阳能光伏力量;生物量力;环境影响;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号