...
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review
【24h】

Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review

机译:可再生天然气技术的生命周期温室气体排放:比较审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Natural gas is an energy carrier of predominant significance for today's electricity and heating sectors. However, science heavily discusses the actual environmental burden of natural gas mainly due to the uncertainty in upstream methane losses during its extraction and transportation. In this context, numerous technologies pave the way for the production of renewable methane to replace natural gas: biomethane from anaerobic digestion of biomass, substitute natural gas (bio-SNG) from gasification and Power-to-Gas via water electrolysis and subsequent methanation. In recent years, numerous studies aimed at analysing the life cycle carbon intensity of those renewable gases. Given the high degree of freedom in the methodology of life cycle assessment (LCA) however, the studies are highly dependent on the respective boundary conditions and assumptions. To summarise and discuss the different findings, this review identifies and quantitatively analyses 30 life cycle assessment studies on the greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gases, comparing their results and deriving the main determinants on their environmental friendliness. A comparison between the results for renewable gases and existing literature reviews on the LCA of fossil natural gas shows the considerable emission reduction potential of renewable gases. This however requires the consideration and right implementation of the main influencing factors (inter alia the storage of digestate in closed tanks for biomethane, heat extraction of excess heat for bio-SNG, or the use of renewable electricity for Power-to-Gas) and is not a mere result of the technologies per se.
机译:天然气是对当今的电力和供热部门的主要意义的能量载体。然而,科学大大讨论了天然气的实际环境负担,主要是由于在提取和运输过程中上游甲烷损失的不确定性。在这种情况下,许多技术为生产可再生甲烷的生产方式铺平了替代天然气:从厌氧消化的生物量,通过水电解和随后的甲烷替代天然气(Bio-SNG)替代天然气(Bio-SNG)。近年来,许多研究旨在分析这些可再生气体的生命周期碳强度。然而,鉴于生命周期评估(LCA)方法的高度自由度,研究高度依赖于各自的边界条件和假设。为了总结和讨论不同的结果,本综述确定并定量分析了可再生气体温室气体排放的30个生命周期评估研究,比较了它们的结果并导出了其环境友好的主要决定因素。对化石天然气LCA的可再生气体和现有文献评论的结果进行了比较,表明了可再生气体的相当减排潜力。然而,这需要考虑和正确实施主要影响因素(尤其是在封闭罐中储存的生物甲烷,用于生物SNG的过热的热量提取,或使用可再生电力的电力 - 天然气)和不是技术人员本身的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号