...
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable Power Generation, IET >Standalone fuel cell generation system with different tracking techniques: economic analysis
【24h】

Standalone fuel cell generation system with different tracking techniques: economic analysis

机译:具有不同跟踪技术的独立燃料电池发电系统:经济分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) can be operated at different points such as the maximum power point (MPP) to extract maximum power and the maximum efficiency point (MEP) to operate at maximum efficiency. However, the different tracking techniques influence the cost of electricity (COE) of the fuel cell generation system. In this paper, the economic analysis of the PEMFC with the MPP tracking (MPPT) and MEP tracking (MEPT) techniques using the HOMER energy system analysis software is presented. A detailed comparison of the economic impact of the tracking techniques for ten load configurations of a standalone fuel cell generation system, which includes combined heat and power (CHP) loads is presented and discussed. Finally, based on economic considerations, a procedure to select a suitable tracking technique for particular requirements of the standalone PEMFC application is proposed. It is found that in the case of CHP configuration, the MPPT technique is the preferred technique to achieve low COE.
机译:质子交换膜燃料电池(PEMFC)可以在不同的点运行,例如最大功率点(MPP)以提取最大功率,而最大效率点(MEP)以最大效率运行。但是,不同的跟踪技术会影响燃料电池发电系统的电费(COE)。本文利用HOMER能源系统分析软件,通过MPP跟踪(MPPT)和MEP跟踪(MEPT)技术对PEMFC进行了经济分析。提出并讨论了跟踪技术对独立燃料电池发电系统的十种负荷配置(包括热电联产(CHP)负荷)的经济影响的详细比较。最后,基于经济考虑,提出了一种针对独立PEMFC应用的特定要求选择合适的跟踪技术的过程。发现在CHP配置的情况下,MPPT技术是实现低COE的优选技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号