首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste
【24h】

Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste

机译:城市生活垃圾发电的技术,经济和环境分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Four technologies are investigated which produce energy from municipal solid waste (MSW): incineration, gasification, generation of biogas and utilisation in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant, generation of biogas and conversion to transport fuel. Typically the residual component of MSW (non-recyclable, non-organic) is incinerated producing electricity at an efficiency of about 20% and thermal product at an efficiency of about 55%. This is problematic in an Irish context where utilisation of thermal products is not the norm. Gasification produces electricity at an efficiency of about 34%; this would suggest that gasification of the residual component of MSW is more advantageous than incineration where a market for thermal product does not exist. Gasification produces more electricity than incineration, requires a smaller gate fee than incineration and when thermal product is not utilised generates less greenhouse gas per kWh than incineration. Gasification of MSW (a non-homogenous fuel) is, however, not proven at commercial scale. Biogas may be generated by digesting the organic fraction of MSW (OFMSW). The produced biogas may be utilised for CHP production or for transport fuel production as CH_4-enriched biogas. When used to produce transport fuel some of the biogas is used in a small CHP unit to meet electricity demand on site. This generates a surplus thermal product. Both biogas technologies require significantly less investment costs than the thermal conversion technologies (incineration and gasification) and have smaller gate fees. Of the four technologies investigated transport fuel production requires the least gate fee. A shortfall of the transport fuel production technology is that only 50% of biogas is available for scrubbing to CH_4-enriched biogas.
机译:研究了四种利用城市固体废物(MSW)产生能量的技术:焚烧,气化,沼气的产生以及热电联产(CHP)厂的利用,沼气的产生以及向运输燃料的转化。通常,焚烧垃圾中的残余成分(不可回收,非有机),发电效率约为20%,热产物发电效率约为55%。在爱尔兰的情况下这是成问题的,在爱尔兰,热产品的利用不是常态。气化发电效率约为34%;这表明,在没有热能产品市场的情况下,MSW残留成分的气化比焚化更为有利。气化比焚化产生更多的电力,比焚化产生更少的门费,并且当不利用热能产品时,每千瓦时产生的温室气体要少于焚化。然而,尚未在商业规模上证明MSW(非均质燃料)的气化。沼气可以通过消化MSW(OFMSW)的有机部分而产生。产生的沼气可被用作CHP的生产或作为CH_4富集沼气的运输燃料的生产。当用于生产运输燃料时,一些沼气被用于小型CHP装置中,以满足现场的电力需求。这产生了多余的热量产物。两种沼气技术都比热转化技术(焚化和气化)所需的投资成本低得多,并且门费也较小。在所研究的四种技术中,运输燃料的生产需要最低的入场费。运输燃料生产技术的不足之处在于,只有50%的沼气可用于洗涤富含CH_4的沼气。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号