首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland
【24h】

The optimal production of biogas for use as a transport fuel in Ireland

机译:爱尔兰用作运输燃料的沼气的最佳产量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Biofuels Directive places an onus on EU member states to ensure that biofuels are placed on their markets. This paper investigates the use of CH_4-enriched biogas as a fuel. A number of options, which produce CH_4-enriched biogas, were analysed from technical, economic and environmental perspectives. Biogas may be produced at a centralised anaerobic digestion (CAD) facility, accepting agricultural slurries plus a portion (typically 20%) of municipal waste such as the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Alternatively, OFMSW may be the sole feedstock utilised in the dry anaerobic combustion (DRANCO) process. Importation of green electricity to satisfy parasitic electrical demand and the burning of biogas to satisfy thermal demand was found to be more advantageous than using biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant to cover parasitic electrical and thermal demand. The DRANCO process produced more fuel than the CAD process due to the lower thermal demand of the digester. The economics of the DRANCO process were superior to the CAD process due to the greater gate fee (it is assumed that no gate fee is obtained from agricultural slurry) and the greater quantity of biogas available for sale. The DRANCO process leads to greater greenhouse-gas savings than the CAD process due to the displacement of more OFMSW from landfill and more petrol from transport. The options when applied to Ireland could lead to a substitution of 1% of petrol and diesel and to a 12% reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions from the transport sector.
机译:《生物燃料指令》对欧盟成员国有责任,以确保将生物燃料投放到其市场上。本文研究了使用富含CH_4的沼气作为燃料。从技术,经济和环境角度分析了许多产生富含CH_4的沼气的选项。沼气可以在集中式厌氧消化(CAD)设施中生产,可以接受农业浆料以及部分(通常为20%)市政废物,例如市政固体废物的有机部分(OFMSW)。或者,OFMSW可能是干式厌氧燃烧(DRANCO)工艺中使用的唯一原料。已发现,进口绿色电力来满足寄生电力需求和燃烧沼气来满足热需求比在沼气热电联产工厂中使用沼气来满足寄生电力和热需求更为有利。由于蒸煮器的热量需求较低,DRANCO工艺比CAD工艺产生的燃料更多。 DRANCO流程的经济性优于CAD流程,这是因为更高的入门费(假定没有从农业浆料中获得入门费)和可出售的更多沼气。由于取代了垃圾填埋场的更多OFMSW和运输了更多的汽油,DRANCO工艺比CAD工艺节省了更多的温室气体。如果将这些选项应用于爱尔兰,则可以替代1%的汽油和柴油,并使运输部门的温室气体排放量减少12%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号