首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >A tall tower study of Missouri winds
【24h】

A tall tower study of Missouri winds

机译:密苏里风的高塔研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper summarizes the results of a study of wind speeds observed at heights up to 150 m above ground level around Missouri. This is an amalgamation of four projects that allowed a total of eleven tall communication towers to be instrumented with wind observation equipment across the State of Missouri. This provided an assessment of the wind resource and the characteristics of the seasonal and diurnal cycles of wind in different areas of Missouri at the heights of utility scale wind turbines. Comparisons were also made to wind speeds predicted at these levels from a previously published wind map. The main finding was that the observed winds at each tower were smaller than those presented in the wind map. The discrepancy is most likely to be due to underestimation of the surface roughness and turbulence leading to an overestimation of near-surface wind shear. However, the wind shear, as expressed by the shear parameter was consistently greater than the 'standard' value of 1.4. The reconciliation of these two apparently contradictory findings is that the shear varies with the height at which it is measured. In wind resource assessment, wind shear is usually observed below 50 m and is tacitly assumed to be constant with height when used to extrapolate winds to higher levels. The author advocates the use of the friction velocity as a measure of shear in wind power applications in preference to the shear parameter that is usually used. This is because the shear parameter has a velocity bias that can also manifest as a bias with height or season. As wind power resource assessment is starting to use taller towers than the standard 50 m, intercomparison of site resources and extrapolation to turbine heights can be compromised if the shear parameter is used.
机译:本文总结了密苏里州周围最高海拔150 m处观测到的风速研究结果。这是四个项目的合并,总共允许在密苏里州的十一座高通讯塔上安装风观测设备。这提供了对风能资源以及密苏里州不同地区在公用事业规模风力涡轮机高度的风的季节性和昼夜循环特征的评估。还对以前发布的风图在这些级别预测的风速进行了比较。主要发现是,在每个塔上观察到的风小于风向图中显示的风。差异最可能是由于对表面粗糙度和湍流的低估导致了对近地表风切变的高估。但是,由切变参数表示的风切变始终大于“标准”值1.4。这两个明显矛盾的发现的调和是,剪切力随其测量高度而变化。在风资源评估中,通常在50 m以下观察到风切变,并且在用于将风推算到更高水平时,默认默认为高。作者主张将摩擦速度用作风能应用中的剪切量度,而不是通常使用的剪切参数。这是因为剪切参数具有速度偏差,该偏差也可以表现为高度或季节的偏差。当风能资源评估开始使用比标准50 m高的塔时,如果使用剪切参数,则可能会损害场地资源的相互比较以及对涡轮机高度的外推。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Renewable energy》 |2011年第1期|p.330-337|共8页
  • 作者

    Neil I. Fox;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Soil. Environmental and Atmospheric Sciences, 332 ABNR Building, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    wind resource assessment; tall tower study; wind shear;

    机译:风资源评估;高塔研究风切变;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:26:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号