Abst'/> Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optima1 energy system design
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optima1 energy system design
【24h】

Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optima1 energy system design

机译:不同时间序列聚合方法对optima1能源系统设计的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

AbstractModeling renewable energy systems is a computationally-demanding task due to the high fluctuation of supply and demand time series. To reduce the scale of these, this paper discusses different methods for their aggregation into typical periods. Each aggregation method is applied to a different type of energy system model, making the methods fairly incomparable.To overcome this, the different aggregation methods are first extended so that they can be applied to all types of multidimensional time series and then compared by applying them to different energy system configurations and analyzing their impact on the cost optimal design.It was found that regardless of the method, time series aggregation allows for significantly reduced computational resources. Nevertheless, averaged values lead to underestimation of the real system cost in comparison to the use of representative periods from the original time series. The aggregation method itself e.g., k-means clustering plays a minor role. More significant is the system considered: Energy systems utilizing centralized resources require fewer typical periods for a feasible system design in comparison to systems with a higher share of renewable feed-in. Furthermore, for energy systems based on seasonal storage, currently existing models integration of typical periods is not suitable.HighlightsTime series aggregation significantly reduce the computational load of energy system optimization models.Cluster algorithms perform much better in comparison to averaged monthly profiles, for example.The choice of the clustering algorithm itself has a minor impact on the quality of time series aggregation, but cluster medoids as representative periods produces more accurate results than cluster centroids.The impact of the aggregation level is highly system-specific and not generalizable.The aggregation methods are published as open source python package:https://github.com/FZJ-IEK3-VSA/tsam.
机译: 摘要 由于供需时间序列的波动很大,对可再生能源系统进行建模是一项计算量很大的任务。为了减少这些问题的规模,本文讨论了将它们汇总到典型时期的不同方法。每种聚合方法都适用于不同类型的能源系统模型,从而使这些方法无可比拟。 要克服这一点,首先扩展不同的聚合方法,以便将其应用于所有类型的多维时间序列,然后将其应用于不同的能源系统配置并分析其对成本优化设计的影响。 发现无论采用哪种方法,时间序列聚合都可以显着减少计算资源。但是,与使用原始时间序列中的代表性时段相比,平均值导致实际系统成本的低估。聚合方法本身(例如k均值聚类)起着较小的作用。所考虑的系统更为重要:与可再生馈电份额较高的系统相比,利用集中式资源的能源系统需要较少的典型时间来进行可行的系统设计。此外,对于基于季节性存储的能源系统,当前不适合对典型时期进行模型集成。 突出显示 时间序列聚合可显着减少能源系统优化模型的计算量。 与平均每月配置文件相比,集群算法的性能要好得多。 选择聚类算法本身对时间序列聚合的质量影响不大,但是聚类中心作为代表周期比聚类中心产生更准确的结果。 聚合级别的影响很大 聚合方法以开源python软件包的形式发布: https://github.com/FZJ-IEK3-VSA/tsam

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号