首页> 外文期刊>Renewable energy >Potential advantages in heat and power production when biogas is collected from several digesters using dedicated pipelines - A case study in the 'Province of West-Flanders' (Belgium)
【24h】

Potential advantages in heat and power production when biogas is collected from several digesters using dedicated pipelines - A case study in the 'Province of West-Flanders' (Belgium)

机译:使用专用管道从数个沼气池收集沼气时,在热力发电方面的潜在优势-以“西弗拉芒省”为例(比利时)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the case study "West-Flanders" costs of electricity and heat production are estimated if a dedicated biogas grid using pipelines would be implemented to centralize energy production in a region. Heat may not be used effectively at digester sites, e.g. because of a change in treatment of digestate. A large scale centralized combined heat and power (CHP) engine can produce additional electrical power at a hub, i.e. central collection point, and has lower specific costs compared to decentralized CHPs at digester sites. A biogas transport model is used to calculate transport costs in a grid. These costs, partly balanced by a scale advantage in CHP costs, are attributed to the additional electrical energy (80%) and heat (20%) produced. If the hub is at a digester site, costs of additional electricity can be as low as 4.0 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1) and are in many cases below 12 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1), i.e. in the same order of magnitude or lower than costs of electricity from biogas produced using separate CHPs at the different digester sites; costs of heat at the hub show to be lower than 1 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1) assuming an effective heat use of 50%. In case a hub is situated at a location with high potential heat demand, i.e. a heat sink, transport of biogas from one digester only to a central located hub can provide 3.4 MWth of heat at 1.95 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1). For such a centrally located hub additional electrical energy costs show to be slightly higher, but with three or more digesters these costs are lower than 20 (sic)ct kWh(e)(-1) and heat costs are around 0.5 (sic)ct kWh(th)(-1). With a centralized hub more renewable energy is produced, i.e. a more efficient use of biomass feedstock. It is concluded that costs for additional electricity and heat can be at a competing level and scale advantages in a CHP can be a driver to collect biogas at a hub using a biogas grid. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在案例研究“西弗拉芒省”中,如果将实施使用管道的专用沼气网格以集中某个地区的能源生产,则将估算电力和热力生产成本。热量可能无法在消化器位置有效利用,例如因为消化方法的改变。大型集中式热电联产(CHP)发动机可以在枢纽(即中央收集点)产生额外的电力,并且与沼气池中的分散式CHP相比,具有较低的单位成本。沼气运输模型用于计算网格中的运输成本。这些成本部分由CHP成本的规模优势所平衡,这归因于所产生的额外电能(80%)和热量(20%)。如果枢纽位于蒸煮场,则额外的电费可低至4.0(sic)ct kWh(e)(-1),在许多情况下低于12(sic)ct kWh(e)(-1)即,与在不同的消化器场所使用单独的热电联产产生的沼气相比,其成本在同一数量级或更低;假设有效热量使用率为50%,则轮毂的热成本显示低于1(sic)ct kWh(th)(-1)。如果集线器位于潜在的高热量需求位置(即散热器),则仅将一个沼气池中的沼气传输到位于中心的集线器中,就可以以1.95(sic)ct kWh(th)(- 1)。对于这样一个位于中心的枢纽,额外的电能成本显示略高,但是如果使用三个或更多的沼气池,这些成本将低于20(sic)ct kWh(e)(-1),而热成本约为0.5(sic)ct kWh(th)(-1)。通过集中式枢纽,可以生产更多的可再生能源,即更有效地利用生物质原料。结论是,额外的电和热成本可以处于竞争水平,而热电联产的规模优势可以成为驱动器使用沼气网收集沼气的动力。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Renewable energy》 |2020年第4期|549-564|共16页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    Univ Groningen Dept Chem Engn Prod Technol Nijenborgh 4 NL-9747 AG Groningen Netherlands|Hanze Res Ctr Energy Zernikepl 11 NL-7947 AS Groningen Netherlands;

    Hanze Res Ctr Energy Zernikepl 11 NL-7947 AS Groningen Netherlands;

    Hasselt Univ Ctr Environm Sci Martelarenlaan 42 B-3500 Hasselt Belgium|VITO Boeretang 200 B-2400 Mol Belgium;

    Univ Groningen Dept Chem Engn Prod Technol Nijenborgh 4 NL-9747 AG Groningen Netherlands;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biogas CHP; Scale dependency; Electrical efficiency; Biogas transport; Biogas grid; Centralized processing;

    机译:沼气CHP;规模依赖性;电气效率;沼气运输;沼气网;集中处理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号