首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >How to avoid the generation of logic loops in the construction of fault trees
【24h】

How to avoid the generation of logic loops in the construction of fault trees

机译:如何避免在故障树构造中生成逻辑回路

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Generation of an infinite series of identical sub-trees may occur during the construction of a Fault Tree (FT) when one item of equipment in a plant is considered several times in the same sub-tree in the course of the tree extraction from a HazOp (Hazard Operability analysis) analysis. Generation of loops in the construction of an FT can be avoided by means of an ad hoc logical analysis in which certain simple rules of syntax are taken into account. A radical solution, however, can be obtained if identification of unwanted events in a process plant is not undertaken with conventional procedures, such as HazOp (Operability Analysis with guide words, failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) etc.), but with a more modern and structured version, such as Recursive Operability Analysis (ROA), which is both systematic and complete, and allows direct extraction of logic trees, (FT, event trees, etc.) for subsequent quantification. This feature means that, by contrast with conventional operability analysis, the congruence of the ROA itself can be checked. The ROA method is illustrated in this paper with the aid of some simple examples.
机译:在故障树(FT)的构建过程中,如果从HazOp提取树的过程中同一棵子树中的某项设备多次被考虑在同一棵子树中,则可能会生成无限系列的相同子树。 (危害可操作性分析)分析。可以通过临时逻辑分析来避免在FT构造中产生循环,在这种情况下,要考虑某些简单的语法规则。但是,如果不使用常规程序(例如HazOp(带有指导性字的可运行性分析,故障模式和效果分析(FMEA)等))来识别过程工厂中的有害事件,则可以获得根本解决方案。更现代和结构化的版本,例如递归可操作性分析(ROA),既系统又完整,并且可以直接提取逻辑树(FT,事件树等)以进行后续量化。与传统的可操作性分析相比,此功能意味着可以检查ROA本身的一致性。本文通过一些简单示例说明了ROA方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号