首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >A conservative bound for the probability of failure of a 1-out-of-2 protection system with one hardware-only and one software-based protection train
【24h】

A conservative bound for the probability of failure of a 1-out-of-2 protection system with one hardware-only and one software-based protection train

机译:用一个仅硬件和一个基于软件的保护序列来保护一个十分之二的保护系统发生故障的可能性的保守界限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Redundancy and diversity have long been used as means to obtain high reliability in critical systems. While it is easy to show that, say, a 1-out-of-2 diverse system will be more reliable than each of its two individual "trains", assessing the actual reliability of such systems can be difficult because the trains cannot be assumed to fail independently. If we cannot claim independence of train failures, the computation of system reliability is difficult, because we would need to know the probability of failure on demand (pfd) for every possible demand. These are unlikely to be known in the case of software. Claims for software often concern its marginal pfd, i.e. average across all possible demands. In this paper we consider the case of a 1-out-of-2 safety protection system in which one train contains software (and hardware), and the other train contains only hardware equipment. We show that a useful upper (i.e. conservative) bound can be obtained for the system pfd using only the unconditional pfd for software together with information about the variation of hardware failure probability across demands, which is likely to be known or estimatable. The worst-case result is obtained by "allocating" software failure probability among demand "classes" so as to maximize system pfd.
机译:长期以来,冗余和多样性一直被用作在关键系统中获得高可靠性的手段。虽然很容易表明,例如,每2个系统中的1个系统将比其两个单独的“火车”中的每一个更为可靠,但由于无法假定这些火车,因此很难评估此类系统的实际可靠性独立失败。如果我们不能主张列车故障的独立性,那么系统可靠性的计算将很困难,因为我们需要知道每种可能需求的按需故障概率(pfd)。在软件的情况下,不太可能知道这些。软件索赔通常涉及其边际pfd,即所有可能需求的平均值。在本文中,我们考虑了一种“二选一”安全保护系统的情况,其中一列火车包含软件(和硬件),而另一列火车仅包含硬件设备。我们表明,仅使用软件的无条件pfd以及有关跨需求的硬件故障概率变化的信息(可能是已知的或可估计的),就可以为系统pfd获得有用的上限(即保守)。最坏情况的结果是通过在需求“类别”之间“分配”软件故障概率来获得的,从而使系统pfd最大化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号