首页> 外文期刊>Regional science and urban economics >How low income neighborhoods change: Entry, exit, and enhancement
【24h】

How low income neighborhoods change: Entry, exit, and enhancement

机译:低收入社区的变化方式:进入,退出和改善

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines whether the economic gains experienced by low-income neighborhoods in the 1990s followed patterns of classic gentriflcation (as frequently assumed) - that is, through the in migration of higher income white, households, and out migration (or displacement) of the original lower income, usually minority residents, spurring racial transition in the process. Using the internal Census version of the American Housing Survey, we find no evidence of heightened displacement, even among the most vulnerable, original residents. While the entrance of higher income homeowners was an important source of income gains, so too was the selective exit of lower income homeowners. Original residents also experienced differential gains in income and reported greater increases in their satisfaction with their neighborhood than found in other low-income neighborhoods. Finally, gaining neighborhoods were able to avoid the losses of white households that non-gaining low income tracts experienced, and were thereby more racially stable rather than less.
机译:本文研究了1990年代低收入社区的经济收益是否遵循经典的绅士化模式(通常被假定)-即通过高收入白人的迁入,家庭的迁入和迁徙(或流离失所)。最初较低的收入(通常为少数民族居民)在此过程中促进了种族过渡。使用美国住房调查的内部人口普查版本,即使在最脆弱的原始居民中,我们也没有发现流离失所加剧的迹象。高收入房主的进入是收入增长的重要来源,低收入房主的选择性退出也是如此。与其他低收入社区相比,原始居民的收入也有所增长,并且对社区的满意度有所提高。最后,获得收入的社区能够避免失去非收入低收入阶层的白人家庭的流失,从而使种族更加稳定而不是更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号