首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >An assessment of the state of national archival and records systems in the ESARBICA region
【24h】

An assessment of the state of national archival and records systems in the ESARBICA region

机译:对ESARBICA地区国家档案和记录系统状态的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to assess and compare the current state of archival and records systems in two of ESARBICA member countries, namely South Africa and Botswana. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses a qualitative research approach. To draw inferences and make recommendations, a survey was conducted in national and provincial archival institutions of both countries. Secondary data were derived from literature search and primary data from questionnaires. Findings - While archives and records services in both countries do have legislation, they are not being recognised and given status in the government and public arena. Archivists and records managers in either country are still marginalised by state administration. There is no political champion of archives and records management in either country. There is a shortage of funds and staff, accompanied by poor infrastructure and lack of vision by the leaders of archival institutions in both countries. In South Africa, the national archives have inherited a role from the previous dispensation and it still remains a subordinate functionary within the Department of Arts and Culture, rather than being relatively independent, hi Botswana, the national archival system is centralised and is also a subordinate functionary within the Ministry of Youth, Sports and Culture. Practical implications - The findings and recommendations will help in guiding national and provincial archival institutions in both countries to facilitate the effective management of records to determine those of archival value, to preserve them for posterity and to make them accessible to the public. Originality/value - This is the first comparative study on archival and reocrds management systems between Botswana and South Africa.
机译:目的-本文的目的是评估和比较两个ESARBICA成员国(即南非和博茨瓦纳)的档案和记录系统的当前状态。设计/方法/方法-本文使用定性研究方法。为了得出结论并提出建议,在两国的国家和省级档案机构中进行了一项调查。次要数据来自文献检索,主要数据来自问卷调查。调查结果-尽管两国的档案和记录服务都有立法,但它们在政府和公共场合并未得到认可和赋予地位。两国的档案工作者和档案管理员仍然被国家行政管理边缘化。两国都没有政治上的档案和记录管理冠军。两国缺少资金和人员,基础设施落后,档案机构负责人缺乏远见。在南非,国家档案馆继承了以前的档案室的作用,它仍然是文化艺术部的下属机构,而不是相对独立的。在博茨瓦纳,国家档案系统是集中的,也是下属的青年,体育和文化部内的工作人员。实际意义-这些发现和建议将有助于指导两国的国家和省级档案机构,以促进对档案的有效管理,以确定具有档案价值的档案,以备后代之用,并使之可供公众使用。原创性/价值-这是对博茨瓦纳与南非之间档案和reocrds管理系统的首次比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号