首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >Public Information Directive (PSI) implementation in two Swedish municipalities
【24h】

Public Information Directive (PSI) implementation in two Swedish municipalities

机译:在两个瑞典城市中实施公共信息指令(PSI)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - This paper examines the implementation of the Public Sector Information (PSI) directive in two Swedish municipalities amidst a changing information management landscape impacted by e-govemment development. Government information is currently looked upon as a "gold mine" and "raw material" to be explored by interested parties. The PSI directive grants European citizens a right to access government information flows (PSI) in order to develop new electronic services. The Swedish government implemented its PSI directive in July 2010. Swedish municipalities have to embrace the directive and make the PSI available to the general public. The literature review highlighted a number of critical issues that should be addressed if PSI initiatives are to succeed. This study revealed that the two municipalities had different resource capacities, and the levels of e-government development varied. This meant that the implementation of the PSI directive also varied. The bigger municipality with a bigger budget had implemented the PSI directive and was publishing data sets on its website, while the smaller municipality with a smaller budget only published a few documents. This paper, therefore, argues that the municipalities should have the same capacity if the PSI is to be a democratic endeavor to serve all citizens. Good quality PSI will also require the municipalities to embrace a records and information continua thinking, which highlights the necessity to proactively and holistically manage the information for pluralization in different contexts. Design/methodology/approach - This paper builds on interviews that were conducted with four municipal officers. The number of respondents is quite small because the focus was specifically on people who were responsible for the implementation of the PSI directive in the municipalities. The respondents were identified through their fellow colleagues and they also recommended each other. Pickard refers to this kind of approach as a snow-bowling approach. Through interviews and observation, one participant advises on issues that need further inquiry and, hence, directs the researcher to another person who might offer more answers. A general interview guide approach was used to solicit answers to issues such as the implementation of the PSI directive, guidelines for PSI publication, if terms such as big data and open data were being used in the municipalities, if the municipalities had an information governance plan and how it was understood, if the information systems were well aligned to meet with the requirements of the PSI directive, how e-government development affected information management and information security and if the municipalities had information security guidelines. Findings - The Swedish government requires its administrations to engage in e-government development. This development has led to increased amounts of information that the municipalities have to effectively manage and make available to the general public. However, the municipalities operate under different conditions. Municipalities that are financially stronger are better placed to invest in measures that will lead to better quality PSI. All municipalities are, however, expected to implement the PSI directive. The two municipalities that were the subjects of this study had different information management environments and the capacity to invest in information management systems that would facilitate the management of their information resources. The budgetary constraints faced by smaller municipalities might impact the implementation of the PSI directive and, hence, hinder the publication of the PSI. e-Govemment is meant to be an inclusive project, and the PSI is meant for all citizens with innovative ideas. There is a risk that citizens who belong to poorer municipalities might not be equally privileged compared to those living in resourceful municipalities. This poses a democratic challenge that should concern all people interested in an open and inclusive society. Originality/value - Little research has so far been published on the implementation process of the PSI directive. The discourses that have started to emerge discuss the challenges of open data without paying much attention to the creation, capture and the management aspects of the PSI. The originality of this paper, therefore, lies in the application of the records and information continua thinking, which highlights dimensions that enhance information management and the democratic challenges that will be caused by the data divide, as municipalities have different capabilities when it comes to the publication of the PSI.
机译:目的-本文探讨了在两个受电子政务发展影响的信息管理格局变化的情况下,瑞典两个城市中公共部门信息(PSI)指令的实施情况。目前,政府信息被视为有意当事方探索的“金矿”和“原材料”。 PSI指令授予欧洲公民访问政府信息流(PSI)的权利,以便开发新的电子服务。瑞典政府于2010年7月实施了PSI指令。瑞典市政当局必须接受该指令,并向公众提供PSI。文献综述着重指出了PSI计划要取得成功应解决的许多关键问题。这项研究表明,两个城市的资源容量不同,电子政务发展水平也各不相同。这意味着PSI指令的实现也有所不同。预算较大的较大城市已经实施了PSI指令,并在其网站上发布了数据集,而预算较小的较小城市仅发布了一些文档。因此,本文认为,如果PSI成为为所有公民服务的民主努力,市政当局应具有相同的能力。高质量的PSI也将要求市政当局采用记录和信息连续性思维,这凸显了在不同情况下积极,全面地管理信息以进行多元化的必要性。设计/方法/方法-本文以对四名市政官员的采访为基础。受访者人数很少,因为关注的重点是专门负责市政当局实施PSI指令的人员。受访者是通过同事发现的,他们也互相推荐。皮卡德(Pickard)将这种方法称为滚雪球方法。通过访谈和观察,一位参与者就需要进一步调查的问题提出建议,从而将研究人员引向可能提供更多答案的另一人。如果市政当局使用了大数据和开放数据之类的术语,并且市政当局制定了信息治理计划,则采用一般的采访指南方法来征求问题的答案,例如PSI指令的实施,PSI发布的指南。以及如何理解,如果信息系统符合PSI指令的要求,电子政务发展如何影响信息管理和信息安全,以及市政当局是否有信息安全指南。调查结果-瑞典政府要求其政府部门参与电子政府的发展。这种发展导致市政当局必须有效管理并向公众提供更多信息。但是,市政当局在不同条件下运作。经济实力较强的市政当局更有条件投资于可带来更高质量PSI的措施。但是,希望所有市政当局都执行PSI指令。作为研究对象的两个城市具有不同的信息管理环境,并且有能力投资于信息管理系统,以促进其信息资源的管理。较小的市政当局所面临的预算限制可能会影响PSI指令的实施,因此会阻碍PSI的发布。电子政务旨在成为一个包容性项目,而PSI则面向具有创新思想的所有公民。与居住在资源丰富的城市的人相比,属于较贫穷城市的公民有可能无法享有同等的特权。这带来了民主挑战,应该使所有对开放包容性社会感兴趣的人们都关心。原创性/价值-到目前为止,关于PSI指令的实施过程的研究很少。已经开始出现的论述讨论了开放数据的挑战,而没有过多关注PSI的创建,捕获和管理方面。因此,本文的独创性在于记录和信息连续性思维的应用,该思想突出了增强信息管理的维度以及因数据分歧而引起的民主挑战,因为市政当局在处理信息和信息方面具有不同的能力。 PSI的发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号