首页> 外文期刊>Rail professional >Enforcing noncompete covenants of departing employees
【24h】

Enforcing noncompete covenants of departing employees

机译:执行离职员工的非竞争性盟约

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

These need to be clear and unambiguous. Where there is a limited market for specialised skill sets, such as the rail industry, the non-compete requirements need to be drafted in a way which still allows the former employee to be employed elsewhere. The restrictions need to be reasonable and proportionate, both in location and time. Often this can be achieved by the employer and employee agreeing a set of undertakings around the time of the employee's departure. However, it is important that the undertakings are clear and unambiguous, as the courts will generally be unwilling to find in favour of the employer if there is any doubt as to what the undertakings covered, whether that be working for a particular company or in a particular area. This situation was recently highlighted in the case of Affinity Workforce Solutions Ltd v McCann and others.
机译:这些必须清楚明确。在诸如铁路行业这样的专业技能市场有限的情况下,不竞争要求的起草方式仍应允许前雇员在其他地方就业。限制在位置和时间上都必须合理且相称。通常,这可以通过雇主和雇员在雇员离职时就一系列承诺达成协议来实现。但是,重要的是,企业要明确无歧义,因为如果对企业所涵盖的企业是否存在疑问,无论是在特定公司还是在一家企业中工作,法院通常都不愿向雇主有利。特定区域。最近在Affinity Workforce Solutions Ltd诉McCann等人的案子中突显了这种情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Rail professional》 |2020年第259期|27-28|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号