...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation Protection Dosimetry >INTERCOMPARISON ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE QUANTITY PERSONAL DOSE EQUFVALENT H_p(10) IN PHOTON FIELDS. LINEARITY DEPENDENCE, LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION AND UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS OF INDIVIDUAL MONITORING SERVICES IN GABON AND GHANA
【24h】

INTERCOMPARISON ON THE MEASUREMENT OF THE QUANTITY PERSONAL DOSE EQUFVALENT H_p(10) IN PHOTON FIELDS. LINEARITY DEPENDENCE, LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION AND UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT OF DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS OF INDIVIDUAL MONITORING SERVICES IN GABON AND GHANA

机译:光子场中人均剂量等效量H_p(10)的测量比较。加蓬和加纳个体监测服务的剂量系统的线性度,检测下限和不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An inter-comparison study was conducted to assess the capability of dosimetry systems of individual monitoring services (IMSs) in Gabon and Ghana to measure personal dose equivalent Hp(10) in photon fields. The performance indicators assessed were the lower limit of detection, linearity and uncertainty in measurement. Monthly and quarterly recording levels were proposed with corresponding values of 0.08 and 0.025 mSv, and 0.05 and 0.15 mSv for the TLD and OSL systems, respectively. The linearity dependence of the dosimetry systems was performed following the requirement given in the Standard IEC 62387 of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The results obtained for the two systems were satisfactory. The procedure followed for the uncertainty assessment is the one given in the IEC technical report TR62461. The maximum relative overall uncertainties, in absolute value, expressed in terms of Hp(10), for the TL dosimetry system Harshaw 6600, are 44.35% for true doses below 0.40 mSv and 36.33% for true doses ≥0.40 mSv. For the OSL dosimetry system microStar, the maximum relative overall uncertainties, in absolute value, are 52.17% for true doses below 0.40 mSv and 37.43% for true doses ≥0.40mSv. These results are in good agreement with the requirements for accuracy of the International Commission on Radiological protection. When expressing the uncertainties in terms of response, comparison with the IAEA requirements for overall accuracy showed that the uncertainty results were also acceptable. The values of Hp(10) directly measured by the two dosimetry systems showed a significant underestimation for the Harshaw 6600 system, and a slight overestimation for the microStar system. After correction for linearity of the measured doses, the two dosimetry systems gave better and comparable results.
机译:进行了一项比较研究,以评估加蓬和加纳的个人监测服务(IMS)的剂量测定系统测量光子场中个人剂量当量Hp(10)的能力。评估的性能指标为检测下限,线性和测量不确定度。提议每月和每季度记录级别,其TLD和OSL系统的对应值分别为0.08和0.025 mSv,以及0.05和0.15 mSv。剂量测定系统的线性相关性是按照国际电工委员会(IEC)的标准IEC 62387中给出的要求进行的。两个系统获得的结果令人满意。不确定度评估遵循的程序是IEC技术报告TR62461中给出的程序。对于TL剂量测定系统Harshaw 6600,以Hp(10)表示的绝对值的最大相对总不确定度,对于0.40 mSv以下的真实剂量为44.35%,对于≥0.40mSv的真实剂量为36.33%。对于OSL剂量测定系统microStar,对于低于0.40 mSv的真实剂量,最大相对总不确定度的绝对值是52.17%,对于≥0.40mSv的真实剂量是37.43%。这些结果与国际放射防护委员会对准确性的要求高度吻合。在用响应表示不确定性时,与国际原子能机构对总体准确性的要求进行比较表明,不确定性结果也是可以接受的。通过两个剂量测定系统直接测量的Hp(10)值对于Harshaw 6600系统显示出明显的低估,而对microStar系统则显示出过高的估计。在校正所测剂量的线性之后,两个剂量测定系统给出了更好且可比的结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Radiation Protection Dosimetry》 |2017年第3期|250-260|共11页
  • 作者单位

    General Directorate of Nuclear Techniques (DGTN), Ministry of Energy and Water Resources, BP 1172 Libreville, Gabon,School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences (SNAS), Department of Medical Physics, PO Box AE1, Atomic-Accra, Ghana;

    School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences (SNAS), Department of Medical Physics, PO Box AE1, Atomic-Accra, Ghana;

    School of Nuclear and Allied Sciences (SNAS), Department of Medical Physics, PO Box AE1, Atomic-Accra, Ghana,Radiation Protection Institute (RPI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), PO Box LG 80, Atomic-Accra, Ghana;

    Radiation Protection Institute (RPI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), PO Box LG 80, Atomic-Accra, Ghana;

    Radiation Protection Institute (RPI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), PO Box LG 80, Atomic-Accra, Ghana;

    Radiation Protection Institute (RPI), Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC), PO Box LG 80, Atomic-Accra, Ghana;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号