首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Study of Jinchuan Mire in NE China I: AMS ~(14)C, ~(210)Pb and ~(137)Cs dating on peat cores
【24h】

Study of Jinchuan Mire in NE China I: AMS ~(14)C, ~(210)Pb and ~(137)Cs dating on peat cores

机译:中国东北金川矿床的研究I:泥炭核上的〜(14)C,〜(210)Pb和〜(137)Cs

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents dating results of AMS C-14, Pb-210 and Cs-137 methods on two young peat profiles from Jinchuan Mire in southeast Jilin of China. JC1 (50-cm long) from a hummock of the mire covers 1962-2007 CE with an accumulation rate of 1.12 cm/y, whereas JCA (92-cm long) from a lawn site involves a 1000-year record with a mean sedimentation of 0.09 cm/y. Comparison of the dating results of the last 100-y part of the peat cores, chronologies based on the AMS C-14 dating are most reliable, because the mobility of Pb-210 and Cs-137 in peat profiles causes overestimation of depositional rate with the larger errors in the deeper layers. The (FC)-C-14 of peat samples were significantly lower than that of the atmospheric CO2 for the post nuclear bomb period because of three reasons: (1) uptake of old CO2 dissolved in the water by aquatic plants during photosynthesis; (2) long-term mixing of the atmospheric CO2 in multiple year growth of the plants; and (3) perhaps dilution effect caused by strong surface runoff. Among these factors, Factor (1) accounts for the major influence. Hence, a "bomb C-14 curve" from a peat profile is necessary for determining post bomb ages. For the pre-nuclear bomb ages, acidbase-acid (ABA) treatment of a peat sample may cause an older-than-true age due to removal of organic acids produced during photosynthesis. This observation calls for detailed investigation of mechanism study and proper pretreatment of peat samples for C-14 dating. The large difference of the depositional rates in the same peatland between JC1 and JCA indicates that estimation of carbon storage in a peatland should be based on the database of multiple sites rather than a couple of cores. For the same reason, one should not use a depositional rate either from a core with distance in the same peatland or from an adjacent peatland.
机译:本文介绍了AMS C-14,Pb-210和Cs-137方法对吉林省东南部金川泥潭的两个年轻泥炭剖面的测年结果。泥潭山丘上的JC1(长50厘米)覆盖1962年至2007年CE,堆积速率为1.12厘米/年,而草坪场地上的JCA(长92厘米)则涉及1000年的平均沉积记录0.09厘米/年。比较泥炭岩心最后100年部分的测年结果,基于AMS C-14测年的年代学是最可靠的,因为Pb-210和Cs-137在泥炭剖面中的流动性会高估沉积速率。较深层的误差较大。核弹爆炸后,泥炭样品的(FC)-C-14显着低于大气中的CO2,这有以下三个原因:(1)水生植物在光合作用过程中吸收了水中溶解的旧CO2; (2)植物多年生中大气中二氧化碳的长期混合; (3)可能是由于强烈的地表径流引起的稀释作用。在这些因素中,因素(1)是主要影响因素。因此,来自泥炭剖面的“炸弹C-14曲线”对于确定炸弹后的年龄是必要的。对于核弹爆炸前的年龄,由于去除了光合作用过程中产生的有机酸,泥炭样品的酸碱酸(ABA)处理可能会导致年龄超过真实年龄。这项观察结果要求对C-14测年的泥炭样品进行机理研究和适当预处理的详细研究。在JC1和JCA之间,同一泥炭地中的沉积速率差异很大,这表明泥炭地中碳储量的估算应基于多个地点的数据库,而不是几个核心。出于同样的原因,无论是来自同一泥炭地中具有一定距离的岩心,还是来自相邻泥炭地的沉积率都不应使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号