首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >An approach to Palaeolithic networks: The question of symbolic territories and their interpretation through Magdalenian art
【24h】

An approach to Palaeolithic networks: The question of symbolic territories and their interpretation through Magdalenian art

机译:旧石器时代网络的一种方法:象征性领土的问题及其通过马格达莱尼亚艺术的诠释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Magdalenian (20,500-13,000 cal. BP) is an important period for the cultural evolution of societies in the European Upper Palaeolithic. It is characterized by a great increase in settlements and products, probably reflecting demographic growth. Along with other material evidence, symbolic products (art and ornaments) clearly expand. In association with the multiplication of representations, some of them become highly normalized (included geometric signs) whereas others develop a great diversity of forms (such as human depictions).The density of sites and more-or-less normalized products make possible an original spatial interpretation, that is probably unprecedented for Palaeolithic societies. Beyond highlighting the diffusion of some concepts over long distances, these rich data allow a deeper analysis of exchange, influence, and non-influence connections. Consequently, the question arises of the identification of what can be called "territories" (spaces built and delimited by human occupations) or "symbolic territories". We define "symbolic territories" as spaces without visible material frontiers, symbolic through the weight of the ideas, the shared social norms and the installation of concepts by the societies in their close environment.We propose to examine this question through the prism of symbolic productions: body ornaments, portable art, rock art. Thousands of pieces of symbolic evidence assigned to the Magdalenian and a better stratigraphic definition for this period offer a favourable context for discussing the social implications of the results of several analyses: the distribution of themes in space, the presence of types of sign or figurative subjects contained in a narrow space, the identification of individual images and collective graphic norms. Comparing these approaches to series from the Middle and Upper Magdalenian, in which the evidence is the most abundant, will allow us to consider the nature of perceptible "territories". Then we will question the relationships between human groups through identity and mechanisms of otherness in Magdalenian societies. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:玛格达琳时代(20,500-13,000 cal。BP)是欧洲上古石器时代社会文化发展的重要时期。它的特点是定居点和产品的大量增加,可能反映了人口的增长。与其他物质证据一起,象征性产品(艺术品和装饰品)也明显扩展。与表示形式的增加相关的是,其中一些变得高度标准化(包括几何符号),而另一些则表现出极大的形式多样性(例如人的描绘)。位置的密度和或多或少的标准化产物使原始的成为可能空间解释,这对于旧石器时代的社会来说可能是前所未有的。这些丰富的数据除了强调长距离传播某些概念之外,还可以对交换,影响和无影响的联系进行更深入的分析。因此,出现了一个问题,即如何识别“领土”(由人类占领建立和界定的空间)或“象征性领土”。我们将“象征性领土”定义为没有明显的物质边界的空间,通过思想的权重,共享的社会规范和社会在其封闭环境中的概念的安装来象征性地表示。标志性产品:人体装饰品,便携式艺术,岩石艺术。数以千计的象征性证据被分配给了抹大拉的马利亚人,并为这一时期提供了更好的地层学定义,为讨论几种分析结果的社会影响提供了有利的背景:空间中主题的分布,符号或象征性主题的存在包含在狭窄空间中的个体图像识别和集体图形规范。将这些方法与中马格达利尼亚中部和上部马格达林式的方法进行比较(证据最丰富),将使我们能够考虑可感知的“领土”的性质。然后,我们将通过马格达林社会的身份和其他机制质疑人类群体之间的关系。 (c)2017年爱思唯尔有限公司和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号