首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Contribution of black carbon in recent sediments of the Gulf of Cadiz: Applicability of different quantification methodologies
【24h】

Contribution of black carbon in recent sediments of the Gulf of Cadiz: Applicability of different quantification methodologies

机译:加的斯湾近期沉积物中黑碳的贡献:不同定量方法的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the Southwestern Iberian Peninsula, vegetation fires are rather common, and produce a considerable amount of charred material that, due to erosion, is fluvially transported to the continental margins. The present study constitutes the first comparative assessment of the contribution of this charred material (generally black carbon, BC) to marine sediments of the inner continental shelf of the Gulf of Cidiz (GoC). Given the ambiguity of BC definition and the heterogeneity of quantification techniques, four of the most common and well established methodologies were applied to obtain a representative range of the BC content on four surface sediments: chemical-thermal oxidation (GBC), molecular markers (benzenopo-lycarboxylic acids, BPCA), thermogravimetry coupled to mass spectrometry (TG-DSC-QMS), and chemical oxidation with sodium chlorite. The BC results obtained for the GoC sediments are compared, and the applicability of each technique on marine sediments is discussed.The mean BC values of the four methods (4.4-14.4% total organic carbon) were within ranges previously reported for marine sediments from diverse origins. However, a large variability was observed within individual samples when comparing the BC results obtained with the four methods (relative standard deviation from 31% to 75%). The BPCA approach produced the highest BC values, whereas the GBC method the lowest. This reflects the analytical variability derived from the different windows composing the BC continuum. The results derived from the TG-DSC-QMS application generated certain uncertainties, despite the correction factor introduced to reduce the BC overestimation previously reported for this method.Considerable differences in the BC content of spatially close samples evidenced the complexity of coastal currents and sediment fluxes in the area, suggesting the existence of other factors affecting the BC distribution. The lack of correlation between the BC and TOC, as well as between the BC and lignin contents in all samples, ruled out the occurrence of charring artifacts. Preferential degradation and/or erosion of BC could explain the BC distribution in the area. The use of ancillary terrigenous biomarkers (lignin and inorganic silica) pointed to a preferential fluvial transport of the terrestrial organic matter and indicated that the longer distance from the source, the greater degradation of the OM. In addition, the northern dominant winds in the region may have favored the additional introduction of airborne transported BC in the marine system.
机译:在西南伊比利亚半岛,植被大火非常普遍,并产生大量烧焦的物质,由于侵蚀,它们被河流运输到大陆边缘。本研究构成了这种烧焦的物质(通常为黑碳,BC)对西迪兹湾(GoC)内陆架海洋沉积物的贡献的首次比较评估。鉴于BC定义的歧义性和定量技术的异质性,应用了四种最常见和最完善的方法来获得四种表面沉积物上BC含量的代表性范围:化学热氧化(GBC),分子标记物(benzenopo -羧酸(BPCA),热重分析与质谱分析(TG-DSC-QMS)以及亚氯酸钠的化学氧化。比较了GoC沉积物获得的BC值,并讨论了每种技术在海洋沉积物中的适用性。四种方法的平均BC值(占总有机碳的4.4-14.4%)均在先前报道的各种海洋沉积物的范围内起源。但是,当比较用四种方法获得的BC结果时,在各个样品中观察到很大的差异(相对标准偏差从31%到75%)。 BPCA方法产生最高的BC值,而GBC方法产生最低的BC值。这反映了从组成BC连续体的不同窗口得出的分析变异性。尽管引入了校正因子以减少先前报道的该方法的BC高估,但从TG-DSC-QMS应用获得的结果仍存在一定的不确定性。空间上接近的样品BC含量的显着差异证明了沿海水流和泥沙通量的复杂性在该地区,表明存在其他影响BC分布的因素。所有样品中BC和TOC之间以及BC和木质素含量之间都没有相关性,从而排除了炭化痕迹的发生。 BC的优先退化和/或侵蚀可以解释该地区的BC分布。辅助陆生生物标志物(木质素和无机二氧化硅)的使用指出了陆生有机物的优先河床运输,并表明与源的距离越远,OM的降解就越大。此外,该地区北部的主导风可能有利于在海洋系统中额外引入机载运输的BC。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2011年第2期|p.264-272|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Institute Tecnologico e Nuclear, Estrada National. 10, Sacavem, Portugal;

    Department of Applied Environmental Sciences, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius vag 8c, SE-114 18 Stockholm, Sweden;

    Institute Ceologico y Minero de Espafia, Rios Rosas 23, 28003 Madrid, Spain;

    Institute de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, C.S.I.C, Reina Mercedes Av. 10, 41080 Seville, Spain;

    Institute de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, C.S.I.C, Reina Mercedes Av. 10, 41080 Seville, Spain;

    Institute de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologia, C.S.I.C, Reina Mercedes Av. 10, 41080 Seville, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:35:43

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号