首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >'Contextual areas'of early Homo sapiens and their significance for human dispersal from Africa into Eurasia between 200 ka and 70 ka
【24h】

'Contextual areas'of early Homo sapiens and their significance for human dispersal from Africa into Eurasia between 200 ka and 70 ka

机译:早期智人的“背景区域”及其对人类从200 ka到70 ka之间从非洲扩散到欧亚大陆的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The African origin of our species has essentially been accepted as a scientific fact, but evolutionary advantages connected with the reasons and circumstances of modern human dispersal remain widely unexplained or controversial. Consequently, this paper provides an overview of the natural and cultural context of earliest AMH (Anatomically Modern Humans). According to the locations and dating of AMH fossils, the focus is on E-Africa, NE-Africa and the Middle East within a time range from 200 ka to 70 ka. At least three different "contextual areas" appear to have existed at the time, two of them in E-Africa and NE-Africa, dominated by "Bifacial-plus-Levallois" technology, and the third one in the Middle East, mostly connected with an "only-Levallois" technology. A comparison with some non-AMH sites from Eurasia displays similarity of technological principles between artifact assemblages from African AMH sites and Eurasian non-AMH (early Neanderthal) sites on the one hand, and dissimilarity between African AMH sites and Middle Eastern AMH sites on the other hand. This is particularly surprising if environmental contexts are taken into account - tropical in Africa and glacial in Eurasia. Thus, compared to their archaic neighbors (particularly early Neanderthals), earliest modern humans currently seem to lack any specific "cultural fingerprint" and their demographic success may not be explained by behavioral superiority alone. The idea of a small group of early AMH people migrating out of Africa, enabled by cultural superiority over their neighbors appears highly questionable in the light of archaeological evidence. Moreover, the concept of virtual "migration routes" deserves a revision if ethnodemographic evidence about spatial behavior of hunter-gatherers is taken into account. The proposed concept of "contextual areas" serves as a methodological alternative, comprising linked cultural and environmental features.
机译:我们物种的非洲起源已被公认是一个科学事实,但是与现代人类传播的原因和环境相关的进化优势仍未得到广泛解释。因此,本文概述了最早的AMH(解剖学现代人类)的自然和文化背景。根据AMH化石的位置和年代,重点是在200 ka至70 ka的时间范围内的E-非洲,NE-非洲和中东。当时似乎至少存在三个不同的“上下文区域”,其中两个位于“非洲”和“东北非”地区,以“两面加Levallois”技术为主导,而中东的第三个区域主要是相互联系的采用“仅Levallois”技术。与来自欧亚大陆的一些非AMH站点的比较显示,一方面,非洲AMH站点与欧亚非AMH(早期尼安德特人)站点的人工制品集合之间的技术原理相似,而非洲AMH站点与中东AMH站点之间的差异则相似。另一方面。如果考虑到环境因素,这尤其令人惊讶-非洲为热带,欧亚大陆为冰河。因此,与其古老的邻居(尤其是尼安德特人早期)相比,目前现代的人类似乎缺乏任何特定的“文化指纹”,而且其人口统计上的成功可能不能仅靠行为优势来解释。从考古学证据的角度来看,一小批AMH早期移民从非洲迁徙到非洲的想法,由于其对邻国的文化优越性而引起的。此外,如果考虑到有关狩猎采集者空间行为的民族志证据,则虚拟的“迁移路线”的概念值得修改。拟议的“语境领域”概念是一种方法上的选择,包括相互联系的文化和环境特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号