首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >Integrated microstratigraphic investigations of coastal archaeological soils and sediments in Norway: The Gokstad ship burial mound and its environs including the Viking harbour settlement of Heimdaljordet, Vestfold
【24h】

Integrated microstratigraphic investigations of coastal archaeological soils and sediments in Norway: The Gokstad ship burial mound and its environs including the Viking harbour settlement of Heimdaljordet, Vestfold

机译:挪威沿海考古土壤和沉积物的微地貌综合调查:戈斯塔德船舶墓葬及其周围地区,包括韦斯特福尔海姆达约约德的维京港口定居点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Investigations of past coastal landscape development have included soil micromorphology, chemistry and microfossil recording of soils and sediments associated with marine inundation and terrestrial soil formation in marine sediments. This paper reports on similarly studied site formation processes at Norwegian coastal sites in Vestfold, Norway: the Viking Period Gokstad Ship Burial Mound and nearby contemporary harbour site of Heimdaljordet. At Gokstad, strategically-focused coring revealed mound composition and an example of its buried soil and geology. The latter investigation suggested that post glacial uplift led to a 'slowstand' period of intertidal reworking of till before ~ 700 BC emergence and development of terrestrial soils. At Heimdaljordet, typically laminated intertidal silty clay loam sediments were sealed by beach sands, into which, for example, a boat grave was dug. Post-depositional processes affecting the Gokstad Mound were compared to those in other mounds, including those recorded in experimental earthworks. Waterlogged conditions in the Gokstad mound led to iron-phosphate migration and preferential deposition of vivianite in turf layers where relict litter (L) layers remained visible, and where wood chips from constructional activities are also very well preserved (as is the long ship itself). These soil insights and other paleoenvironmental studies of the buried soil and numerous turf sequences showed that the contemporary AD 900 Viking landscape was totally terrestrial. It had become wet sedge grassland managed for grazing. The partial weathering of turves and anomalous presence within them of'fresh' roots apparently indicates the possibility that turves were stacked and stored ahead of mound building. The 10th C robber trench had developed muddy features, and rooting traces show that it was not backfilled, but was slowly infilled by humic soil silting from turf mound layers. This event did not affect the overall anaerobic burial conditions in the mound, which can be starkly compared to those at the Heimdaljordet boat grave. Here, because of acidic subaerial weathering, the wooden boat only survives as an acidic pellety humus formed of wood residues that are often ferruginised. Iron appears to be concentrated at iron nail locations. Unlike the Gokstad mound, no bone survives, but one sample found a typical 'body stain' of secondary iron and phosphate close by the iron encrusted sword in the grave (potentially the pelvic region of the inhumation). Here, mineralised faecal gut remains have an assumed hydroxyapatite composition, and embed phytoliths and pollen/spores, as found in human coprolites and cess deposits studied elsewhere.
机译:对过去沿海景观发展的调查包括与海洋淹没和海洋沉积物中陆生土壤形成有关的土壤和沉积物的土壤微观形态,化学和微化石记录。本文报道了在挪威韦斯特福尔德的挪威沿海站点进行类似研究的站点形成过程:维京时期的戈斯塔德轮船埋葬土墩和附近的海姆达尔峡湾当代港口站点。在格克斯塔德(Gokstad),战略重点的取芯揭示了土堆的组成以及其埋藏的土壤和地质的例子。后一项研究表明,冰川后隆升导致潮间带返工的“缓慢期”,直到公元前700年陆生土壤的出现和发展。在Heimdaljordet,典型的层状潮间质粉质壤土沉积物被海滩沙子密封,例如在其中挖出船坟。将影响戈克斯塔德丘的沉积后过程与其他丘中的过程进行了比较,包括实验土方中记录的过程。 Gokstad土墩的涝渍条件导致草皮层中磷酸铁铁迁移和优先维维石沉积,草皮层中仍可见残渣(L)层,并且来自建筑活动的木屑也得到很好的保存(长船本身也是如此) 。这些土壤洞察力以及对埋入土壤和许多草皮层序的其他古环境研究表明,当代的AD 900 Viking景观完全属于陆地。它已经变成了可以管理放牧的湿莎草草原。草坪的局部风化和“新”根中的异常存在显然表明,草坪堆积和存储在土墩建筑之前的可能性。 10 C强盗沟渠具有泥泞特征,生根痕迹表明该沟渠并未回填,但被草坪土墩层的腐殖质土壤淤积缓慢填充。此事件并未影响土丘的整体厌氧埋葬条件,与Heimdaljordet船坟墓的情况相比,这可谓是绝对。在这里,由于酸性的地下风化作用,木制船只能作为酸性颗粒状腐殖质而生存,腐殖质是由经常经过铁素化处理的木渣形成的。铁似乎集中在铁钉位置。与Gokstad土墩不同,没有骨头幸存,但是一个样本发现了典型的二次铁和磷酸盐的“人体污渍”,靠近坟墓中的铁壳剑(可能是人工骨的骨盆区域)。在这里,矿化的粪便肠道残渣具有假定的羟磷灰石成分,并嵌入了植硅石和花粉/孢子,这在其他地方研究到的人类共proprolites和成功沉积物中发现。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Quaternary International》 |2013年第27期|131-146|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34, Cordon Square, London WC1H OPY, UK;

    Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Postbox 6762, St. Olavspiass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway;

    School of Applied Sciences, Christchurch House, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK;

    MAL, Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Umea University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden;

    Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Postbox 6762, St. Olavspiass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号