...
首页> 外文期刊>Quaternary International >The faunal remains from Bundu Farm and Pniel 6: Examining the problematic Middle Stone Age archaeological record within the southern African interior
【24h】

The faunal remains from Bundu Farm and Pniel 6: Examining the problematic Middle Stone Age archaeological record within the southern African interior

机译:来自Bundu Farm和Pniel 6的动物遗骸:检查南部非洲内部存在问题的中石器时代考古记录

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Open-air and interior sites are not prominently featured among models of Middle Stone Age (MSA) subsistence behavior in southern Africa. Thus, the current view of MSA subsistence reflects adaptations interpreted predominantly from coastal rockshelter locations. An attempt to address this gap is presented here with the analysis of the faunal assemblages from Bundu Farm and Pniel 6, two early MSA open-air sites located well within the interior of southern Africa in the Northern Cape, South Africa. Zooarchaeological and taphonomic signatures of the Bundu Farm assemblage suggest some primary access to animal carcasses, while the same measures imply secondary scavenging by early MSA hominins at Pniel 6. A number of other open-air interior sites include similarly ambiguous evidence for the role of hunting and/ or scavenging in hominin subsistence during the MSA. Due to the lack of archaeological surveys directed at finding open-air sites and several taphonomic factors that disproportionately obscure indications of hominin behavior in open-air settings, the archaeological records between open-air interior sites and coastal rockshelter sites are fundamentally incomparable. From an ecological perspective, MSA subsistence was a product of behavioral adaptations to environmental factors and resource availability, the influences of which were likely different between interior and coastal ecosystems. Much like historical hunter-gathers of the region, MSA hominins inhabiting the more marginal environments within the southern African interior may have relied more heavily on gathered plant foods rather than hunting for subsistence. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.
机译:在南部非洲的中石器时代(MSA)生存行为模型中,露天和室内场所并不突出。因此,目前对MSA生存的看法反映了主要从沿海岩石庇护所位置解释的适应性变化。本文试图通过分析来自Bundu Farm和Pniel 6的两个动物群组合来解决这一差距,这两个早期MSA露天场所位于南非北开普省南部非洲内部。邦杜农场组合的动物考古和动物学特征表明,人们可以初步接触动物尸体,而相同的措施则暗示了Pniel 6上MSA早期人源激素的二次清除。许多其他露天内部场所也包括类似的关于狩猎作用的模棱两可的证据。和/或在MSA期间清除人的生存。由于缺乏针对寻找露天场所的考古调查,以及一些在露天环境中人类行为的迹象掩盖不明的成因因素,因此露天内部场所与沿海岩石掩护场址之间的考古记录根本无法比拟。从生态学的角度来看,MSA的生存是对环境因素和资源可获得性的行为适应的产物,其影响在内部和沿海生态系统之间可能有所不同。就像该地区的历史狩猎者聚集地一样,居住在南部非洲内陆较边缘环境中的MSA人种可能更多地依赖采集的植物食物,而不是寻求生存。 (c)2016 Elsevier Ltd和INQUA。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号