首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly review of economics and finance >Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components
【24h】

Analysis of ETF bid-ask spread components

机译:ETF买卖差价成分分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this study we examine on intradaily basis (milliseconds) the largest 100 ETFs' bid-ask spread components in the period March 21,2014 to April 17,2014. We document that ETFs have lower proportion of adverse selection in the bid-ask spread relative to stocks, which also means that the order processing cost component is higher in ETFs. This suggests that uninformed investors prefer to trade ETFs relative to individual stocks. The data in our study also suggests a U-shaped form of the adverse selection component across four categories of ETF trading volume and not a monotone decreasing relation from lowest to highest trading volume ETFs. Fixed-income ETFs have the highest adverse selection component coefficient whereas real estate ETFs have the lowest. Additionally, mutual fund structured ETFs have lower adverse selection component coefficient than the trust structured ETFs. We also document that ETFs with more quotes have lower adverse selection; whereas ETFs with higher average bid price, higher expense ratio and trust structuring of the ETF have higher adverse selection component of the bid-ask spread.
机译:在本研究中,我们以日为单位(毫秒)研究了2014年3月21日至2014年4月17日之间最大的100只ETF的买卖差价成分。我们证明,相对于股票,ETF的买入价差中逆向选择的比例较低,这也意味着ETF的订单处理成本成分较高。这表明不知情的投资者相对于个别股票更喜欢交易ETF。我们研究中的数据还表明,在四类ETF交易量中,逆向选择成分呈U形形式,而不是从最低交易量到最高ETF呈单调递减关系。固定收益ETF的逆向选择成分系数最高,而房地产ETF的最低。此外,共同基金结构的ETF的逆向选择成分系数比信托结构的ETF低。我们还证明,报价更多的ETF的逆向选择较低;而平均竞标价格较高,费用比率较高和ETF的信托结构较高的ETF,其买卖差价的逆向选择成分也较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号