首页> 外文期刊>Quality and Quantity >A Note on the Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Local Exchange Carriers in the United States
【24h】

A Note on the Technical and Allocative Efficiency of Local Exchange Carriers in the United States

机译:关于美国本地交换运营商的技术和分配效率的说明

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The issue explored is whether incentive regulation of local exchange carriers in the United States has resulted in an increase in efficiency. After providing an overview of the nature of incentive regulation, the methodology for measuring the effects of incentive regulation on efficiency is reviewed. This methodology is data envelopment analysis and allows for the measurement of both technical efficiency and allocative efficiency of individual local exchange carriers. The results of empirically implementing the DEA approach indicate that there is little change in technical efficiency. In fact average technical efficiency in 1988 was the same as in 2001. Next, while outputs continued to grow at about their historical rate across LECs, the sizeable increase in the two types of capital increased inputs well above their historical average rates for some LECs leading to short run allocative inefficiency. On average, however, allocative efficiency shows no identifiable trend between 1988 and 2001. Finally, in the aggregate, total economic efficiency does not demonstrate any trend between 1988 and 2001.
机译:探索的问题是,美国对本地交换运营商的激励性监管是否导致效率提高。在概述了激励监管的性质之后,回顾了衡量激励监管对效率的影响的方法。这种方法是数据包络分析,可以测量各个本地交换运营商的技术效率和分配效率。根据经验实施DEA方法的结果表明,技术效率几乎没有变化。实际上,1988年的平均技术效率与2001年的水平相同。其次,尽管所有LEC的产出继续以其历史速度增长,但两种资本的大量增加却大大增加了一些LEC的历史平均速度短期分配效率低下。但是,平均而言,分配效率在1988年至2001年之间没有可识别的趋势。最后,总的来说,总体经济效率在1988年至2001年之间没有任何趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号