首页> 外文期刊>Quality Control, Transactions >Performance Assessment of Positioning Based on Multi-Frequency Multi-GNSS Observations: Signal Quality, PPP and Baseline Solution
【24h】

Performance Assessment of Positioning Based on Multi-Frequency Multi-GNSS Observations: Signal Quality, PPP and Baseline Solution

机译:基于多频多GNSS观测的定位性能评估:信号质量,PPP和基线解决方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

With the advances and modernization of GPS, GLONASS, BDS, Galileo and QZSS, multi-frequency and multi-system joint positioning has become the mainstream positioning and navigation. Therefore, it is of great importance to perform a comprehensive assessment of the signal quality and positioning performance of multi-frequency and multi-GNSS. In this work, we used the multi-GNSS observation data collected by the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS), Hong Kong CORS, and GNSS Research Centre of Curtin University. Firstly, the quality of multi-frequency and multi-GNSS observation data is evaluated and analyzed. Then, the five-system triple-frequency ionospheric-free combined PPP (IF-PPP) and uncombined PPP (UC-PPP) models are established, and their performance in static PPP and kinematic PPP is evaluated. Finally, the performance of multi-frequency multi-GNSS in short baseline, medium long baseline and very long baseline is evaluated. Based on the results, three major observations are made as follows. (1) The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the five constellations (i.e. BDS, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and QZSS) are all above 30dB Hz and the multipath errors are within 1m, indicating good signal quality. (2) For static PPP, compared with IF-PPP model, the convergence time of triple-frequency UC-PPP model is reduced by 4.9%, 3.2%, and 13.8% for BDS-2+3, GPS, and GPS/GLONASS/BDS-2+3/Galileo/QZSS, respectively. However, the positioning accuracy of triple-frequency UC-PPP model is improved by 15.9%, 11.8%, and 10.9%, respectively, compared with IF-PPP model. For kinematic PPP, with the increased number of BDS-3 satellites, BDS has achieved better positioning results than GPS. (3) In terms of baseline solution performance, the accuracy of triple-frequency GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo/QZSS combined baseline solution is about 60% higher than that of triple-frequency GPS-only baseline solution, showing a significant performance gain due to the use of multi-GNSS observations.
机译:随着GPS,Glonass,BDS,伽利略和QZS的进展和现代化,多频和多系统联合定位已成为主流定位和导航。因此,对多频和多GNSS的信号质量和定位性能进行全面评估,这是非常重要的。在这项工作中,我们使用了由Curtin University的国际GNSS服务(IGS),香港CORS和GNSS研究中心的多GNSS实验(MGEX)收集的多GNSS观察数据。首先,评估和分析多频和多GNSS观察数据的质量。然后,建立了五种系统三频离子层组合的PPP(IF-PPP)和未引出的PPP(UC-PPP)模型,并评估它们在静态PPP和运动PPP中的性能。最后,评估了短基线,中长基线和非常长的基线的多频多GNSS的性能。根据结果​​,三个主要观察结果如下。 (1)五星座的信噪比(即,BDS,GPS,Glonass,Galileo和QZS)的信噪比(即,BDS,GPS,Glonass)全部高于30dB Hz,多径误差在1米范围内,表示良好的信号质量。 (2)对于静态PPP,与IF-PPP模型相比,BDS-2 + 3,GPS和GPS / GLONASS的三频UC-PPP模型的收敛时间降低了4.9%,3.2%和13.8% / BDS-2 + 3 / Galileo / QZS分别。然而,与IF-PPP模型相比,三频UC-PPP模型的定位精度分别提高了15.9%,11.8%和10.9%。对于运动PPP,随着BDS-3卫星数量的增加,BDS已经实现了比GPS更好的定位结果。 (3)在基线解决方案性能方面,三频GPS / GLONASS / BDS / GALILEO / QZSS组合基线溶液的精度高于三频GPS的基线解决线的60%,显示出显着的性能增益由于使用多GNSS观察。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号