首页> 外文期刊>Quality and Reliability Engineering International >Development of a FTA versus Parts Count Method Model: Comparative FTA
【24h】

Development of a FTA versus Parts Count Method Model: Comparative FTA

机译:建立FTA与零件计数方法模型:比较FTA

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study adopts a special Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) method called Comparative FTA to compare the reliability of an electronic braking system with its mechanical counterpart. To this end two Top Events, 'Ineffective parking braking' and 'Wheels jamming during emergency braking', were analysed. One of the limitations of classic FTA is that the setting up of the tree diagram requires the long-term involvement―one to two months according to Fiat Auto―of specialists of the system being studied. For this reason, therefore, when dealing with relatively complex systems, classic FTA is only used when safety is involved. This paper introduces a simplified FTA model based on the same principle as the Parts Count Method, which limits its attention to the new branches, thereby avoiding the study of all the branches of the tree, in order to make FTA management easier and to encourage its use. The probability that a Top Event takes place is therefore evaluated by studying the different causes which diversify the solutions considered. This approach is a lean practice to minimize the resources and the time of the analysis. It has guaranteed very satisfactory results and, therefore, Fiat Auto has introduced the practice in their.
机译:本研究采用一种称为比较FTA的特殊故障树分析(FTA)方法,以比较电子制动系统与机械制动系统的可靠性。为此,分析了两个重要事件,即“无效停车制动”和“紧急制动时车轮卡死”。经典FTA的局限性之一是树形图的建立需要所研究系统专家的长期参与(据Fiat Auto称,需要一到两个月)。因此,因此,在处理相对复杂的系统时,仅在涉及安全性时才使用经典FTA。本文介绍了一种简化的FTA模型,该模型基于与“零件计数”方法相同的原理,从而将注意力集中在新分支上,从而避免了对树的所有分支的研究,从而简化了FTA管理并鼓励了FTA管理。采用。因此,通过研究使所考虑的解决方案多样化的不同原因来评估发生顶级事件的可能性。这种方法是一种精益实践,可最大程度地减少分析资源和时间。它保证了非常令人满意的结果,因此,菲亚特汽车公司在他们的产品中引入了这种做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号