首页> 外文期刊>Public works management & policy >Does Transit Mean Business? Reconciling Economic, Organizational, and Political Perspectives on Variable Transit Fares
【24h】

Does Transit Mean Business? Reconciling Economic, Organizational, and Political Perspectives on Variable Transit Fares

机译:过境意味着生意吗?调和关于可变票价的经济,组织和政治观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For decades, transportation scholars have argued for transit fares that vary by mode, distance, and/or time-of-day to reflect the marginal costs of providing transit service. This pricing strategy, they contend, would increase the efficiency and equity of transit service. Recent advances in smartcard fare collection technologies have reduced the operational obstacles to charging variable fares, yet relatively few transit agencies are doing so. Through interviews and a nationwide survey of transit professionals, this research examines why transit managers and their governing boards have been reluctant to adopt variable fare policies. We find that agencies and practitioners have little incentive to understand how the costs of transit service provision vary and that managers and policymakers tend to be loss averse-they worry more about the riders they might lose under variable pricing than those they might gain. Collectively, we find that transit agency objectives impede fare policy innovation.
机译:数十年来,运输学者一直在争论过乘票价,该票价随方式,距离和/或一天中的时间而变化,以反映提供过境服务的边际成本。他们认为,这种定价策略将提高过境服务的效率和公平性。智能卡票价收集技术的最新进展已减少了收取可变票价的操作障碍,但相对而言,很少有公交机构这样做。通过采访和全国范围内的过境专业人士调查,这项研究探讨了为何过境管理人及其董事会不愿采用浮动票价政策。我们发现,代理机构和从业人员几乎没有动力去理解提供运输服务的成本如何变化,并且经理和政策制定者倾向于避免损失-他们更加担心他们在可变价格下可能失去的骑手而不是可能获得的骑手。总的来说,我们发现公交代理机构的目标阻碍了票价政策的创新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号