首页> 外文期刊>Public performance & management review >Speaking Like Statesmen or Scientists: Differentiating Congressional and Administrative Views on Data
【24h】

Speaking Like Statesmen or Scientists: Differentiating Congressional and Administrative Views on Data

机译:像政治家或科学家那样讲话:区分国会和行政部门对数据的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do legislators and executives speak of data the same way when speaking about public sector data ? Public management scholarship and public performance policies often emphasize data-driven decision making as the path to making government efficient and effective. Whether the public policy makers mean the same thing when they speak about data in discussions of data-driven performance and decision making is unknown. In this article, the authors present an analysis of the language of data in conversations about government performance. Two frameworks are identified for the role of data in public performance-the statesman's and the scientist's. A corpus-level analysis of over 30 years of government documents is used to demonstrate the differences between these two approaches. This research builds consciously on the work of previous scholars seeking to map the nuances of data-driven performance management policies in the U.S. federal government.
机译:立法者和行政人员在谈论公共部门数据时是否以相同的方式谈论数据?公共管理奖学金和公共绩效政策通常强调以数据为依据的决策,这是使政府高效有效的途径。未知的是,公共政策制定者在讨论数据驱动的绩效和决策时谈论数据时是否具有相同的意思。在本文中,作者对有关政府绩效的对话中的数据语言进行了分析。对于数据在公共绩效中的作用,确定了两个框架:政治家和科学家。对超过30年的政府文件进行了语料库级分析,以证明这两种方法之间的差异。这项研究有意识地建立在先前学者的工作上,他们试图绘制美国联邦政府中数据驱动绩效管理政策的细微差别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号