首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Bjorn Erik Rasch and George Tsebelis (eds.): The role of governments in legislative agenda setting
【24h】

Bjorn Erik Rasch and George Tsebelis (eds.): The role of governments in legislative agenda setting

机译:比约恩·埃里克·拉施(Bjorn Erik Rasch)和乔治·塞贝利斯(George Tsebelis)(编辑):政府在立法议程制定中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As the public choice revolution matured and a new analysis of legislatures commenced, investigation into these bodies increased dramatically, and in many directions. Theories of rent-seeking, regulation, logrolling, and congressional dominance emerged, and were but a few of the outcomes of applying a rational choice framework to the public sector. Agenda setting certainly belongs on this list as well. Given the cyclical nature of voting systems (Arrow 1963 and McKelvey 1976) along with voting systems in general necessarily being susceptible to strategy (Gibbard 1973 and Satterthwaite 1975), it is only natural to suspect that the self-interested agenda setter(s) manipulate the voting process so as to put himself in a better position.
机译:随着公共选择革命的成熟和对立法机构的新分析开始,对这些机构的调查急剧增加,而且朝着许多方向发展。寻租,规制,记录和国会支配地位的理论应运而生,但这只是将理性选择框架应用于公共部门的一些成果。议程设置当然也属于此列表。考虑到投票系统的周期性(Arrow 1963和McKelvey 1976)以及投票系统通常必然会受到战略的影响(Gibbard 1973和Satterthwaite 1975),自然而然地怀疑自私的议程制定者会操纵投票过程,以使自己处于更好的位置。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Public choice》 |2012年第4期|p.797-799|共3页
  • 作者

    Matt E. Ryan;

  • 作者单位

    Duquesne University, 802 Rockwell Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号