首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Political polarization, congressional redistricting, and trade liberalization
【24h】

Political polarization, congressional redistricting, and trade liberalization

机译:政治两极分化,国会重新划分和贸易自由化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During the last 50 years, political polarization in the US House of Representatives has intensified. One explanation for this trend emphasizes the importance of congressional redistricting. This paper analyzes the relationship between political polarization and redistricting in the context of two trade liberalization bills. The results of the paper indicate that redistricting has not contributed significantly to party polarization over trade policy although it has produced a partisan shift in favor of trade liberalization. Redistricting does not appear to impact political polarization largely because district-level characteristics currently are dominated by broader, national factors such as party affiliation. The results of the paper clearly demonstrate this point by showing that changes in party affiliation have a much greater impact on voting behavior than changes in district characteristics. The paper also finds, however, that institutional control of the redistricting process at the state level has influenced political polarization with respect to trade policy.
机译:在过去的50年中,美国众议院的政治分化加剧了。对于这种趋势的一种解释强调了国会重新分配的重要性。本文在两个贸易自由化法案的背景下分析了政治两极化与再限制之间的关系。本文的结果表明,重新划分虽然引起了支持贸易自由化的党派转变,但并没有显着促进政党对贸易政策的两极化。重新划分似乎并没有影响到政治上的两极分化,这主要是因为目前地区层面的特征主要由更广泛的民族因素(如政党隶属关系)主导。该论文的结果通过表明党派关系的变化对投票行为的影响远大于地区特征的变化,清楚地证明了这一点。但是,本文还发现,国家层面对再分配过程的制度控制影响了贸易政策方面的政治两极化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号